enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 2 (16 items)   1 2 Next >
PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis
As a sign you dispprove of this stupid and pointless feature, please do not post to the "Bidenisms" Fray.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by DirtyBird
Why? Did you do the same for Bushisms or is this just a partisan thing?
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis
No it's not a partisan thing. It's a common sense thing. Go rent some for a couple of hours.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by Wall Street

I will not post in the Bidenisms feature.


Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by Wall Street
Except this one.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by Wall Street
And this one.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by Wall Street
And I'll also make another thread to tell people not to post here. That should do it.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by smashignitionst
completely laughable that some people think it's right to make fun of one president and wrong to make fun of a vice president. I couldn't care less what your opinion on stuff is, but just be consistent, man.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis
"completely laughable that some people think it's right to make fun of one president and wrong to make fun of a vice president" Speaking of me? But how do you know my opinion on the "Bushisms" feature? You don't, do you? You're just imagining that my objections are partisan. As said above, they aren't. And what's this about "making fun"? That's the whole frigging point: there's nothing "fun" or "funny" about "Bidenisms". There's nothing there. I guess if you find it funny that a politician makes a speech at a political rally and says that the upcoming election is going to tough, you are an easy audience. It's just not funny. That's the problem. e "Chenyisms" woulnd't have been funny either, had he bothered to speak during his term. But it's a moot point, since he only got to be a chatty Cathy until he left office.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by DirtyBird
I repeat, did you protest the Bushisms feature?
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis
DirtyBird:
I repeat, did you protest the Bushisms feature?
I repeat: you're a fool. PS: Do a search if you want to know what I've posted.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by DirtyBird

And so I did...look at your previous posts: dribble, tripe and elite condescension. At least you're consistent.

Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis

DirtyBird:

And so I did...look at your previous posts: dribble, tripe and elite condescension. At least you're consistent.

Well, since you've judged me already, why do you ask your stupid question?*

Ah yes, you're an asshole.

Bye.

PS: It would be "drivel" not "dribble". Sorry to condescend, but sometimes a cretin like you is begging for it.


Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by DirtyBird
One person's dribble is another person's drivel, but then again, your condescention is showing isn't it.
Re: PROTEST THIS POINTLESS FEATURE
by marcparis

DirtyBird:
One person's dribble is another person's drivel, but then again, your condescention is showing isn't it.

Well, "dribble" means a small quantity, so I really doubt that's what you meant. But if it pleases you to pretend that "dribble" is some sort of alternate spelling of "drivel", I guess so.

And yeah, I guess if pointing out the fact that you're an idiot is condescension, I'm guilty. Sorry!

But if you want to avoid condescension, you should at least learn to spell it right...

And rhetorical questions usually take a question mark, don't they?

Now just give up. You're not looking good here. And Bidenisms is still a pointless feature. Your ranting about imaginary partisanship doesn't change that, does it?

Page 1 of 2 (16 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML