Er, What About The Pedestrian Take?
by
Carlo Graziani
10/16/2009, 1:37 PM #
There's an important perspective that is missing here: one of the main reasons for regulating vehicle behavior on the roads is to guarantee the safety of pedestrians. From this perspective, allowing bikers to use their own judgment on whether to fly through a stop sign is a really terrible idea. As a pedestrian in Chicago(!) I have had more close shaves in crosswalks with sociopathic bikers than I have had with idiots in cars. At least the idiots know they're supposed to stop.
In addition, it's hard to make the case that bikes are over-regulated after witnessing actual biker behavior on bike paths, especially paths shared with foot traffic (the Chicago Lakefront trail is an example). Once set free on bike paths, many hyper-athletic bikers appear to believe in their absolute right to proceed at unlimited speed, regardless of annoying impediments such as slower bikes, pedestrians, kids, pets, etc. They are, quite simply, a menace, and are the source of multiple accidents every month . A rash of expensive speeding tickets on bike paths would be an extremely welcome corrective.
OK, sorry about that, I feel better now.