Lippmann and Carrey are the "Far Left"? (I'll give you Kenn
by
HopefulCynic
10/13/2009, 11:35 AM #
edy for our purposes here).
I know it does make for a catchy narrative device, great framing, and protect one from appearing "subjective" (gasp!), but while I think one can agree to call Glenn Beck and Limbaugh substantially, perhaps even Far, Right, the assortment of evidence that this is also characteristic of "the Far Left" is: Jim Carrey on HuffPo, Affluent Parents in California, Dr. Lippmann, and Robert Kennedy.
WTF? I know Slate has always valued shiny, neat stories over accuracy over establishing your premise, but c'mon, throw us more than that. RFK can be given as "Far Left", but to pad it out such that he isn't drawing a line from ONE data point, he gives us an actor without clear larger political affiliation writing on a Left site, and the implication that Rich Parents in California = Far Left. I'm not even sure one can correlate affluence and "leftness" in California in that way -- after all, there are many rich people in Northern California, and many industrialists and capitalists throughout the state who may or may not be as Left as their famed Movie Industry colleagues; it's yet another big leap to call them "Far Left", other than on the evidence that: Hey, they live in a dominantly left state! Hey, they're rich! (Cuz all rich people are Democrats and Socialists, didn't you know?) Hey, they're paranoid about vaccines! (Well, hmm, now we're using our conclusion to solidify our premise-- but no Slate writer would ever do that, right?)
I know it just makes for a nifty framing device, one that's "too good to check" as it were, but if it is possible to connect anti-vaccine tendencies to Far Leftism (I didn't see him quoting, say, Anarchists, Marxists, and Socialists, or even Donohue, Nader, Kucinich, and McKinney) as well as Far Rightism, Beam didn't come close to doing it.