but is the virginity fetish the worst islamic affront?
by
baltimore aureole
10/06/2009, 12:50 PM #
let me be clear - i endorse saletan's premise that the islamic virginity fetish is absurd, and reveals their "faith" to little more than a random collection of brutal and offensive obsessions.
but if we're going to take a stand against islam, is this really where we want to start? i'd suggest there are far more offensive things islam perpetuates . . .
- stoning to death adulteresses
- kidnapping africans and making them house slaves or camel racers
- buying and selling young girls for marriage like livestock
- death or imprisonment for men who express a wish to abandon the islam faith (the most recent wrinkle on this are a rash of legal decisions declaring them "insane" and confining them perpetually to asylums)
- intolerance of even a bible on islamic soil (google "bible in luggage at saudi airport" before you pack one in your carryon bag)
i could go on and on about other offenses - the taleban's use of light artillery to eradicate ancient statuary which predates mohammed; the practice of burning kid's pet dogs alive as a "warning" (dogs are unclean, and forbidden by some branches of islam); street riots and stonings over beauty pageant contestants in costumes which offfend some religious elders; herding christians into churches and then burning them alive by setting fire to the building; random bombings of hotels, embassies, and un missions to drive home the point that outside ideas are unwelcome . . . and so on.
returning a bride over lack of vriginity is a problem, yes (i'm not really aware of putting a non-virginal bride to death, but i'm not saying it could never happen)
but in the grand scheme of things, rejection of an arranged marriage bride by a moron is hardly the worst thing that islam does.