Scientifically speaking, the article was correct. The temperature should "officially" be read in an open area away from hot surfaces. And when it is, the "official" temperature stays below 130.
Now ask yourself how many of our troops out here (I am currently stationed in Iraq as well) spend most of their time "in an open area away from hot surfaces". Not many. They are in guard towers and vehicles with air that barely moves. They are walking (or running and fighting) in boots and long sleeved shirts and gloves and helmets and goggles and vests loaded with ammo and weapons and radios. And they are doing it for eight or ten or fourteen hours a day. Several days in a row.
It is now mid-September and the "official" temperature in Baghdad is still breaking 100 every afternoon. I invite the author or anyone else who thinks "oh, but it's a DRY heat" to join me out here for a day or three. I won't even ask any of you to wear all the gear and endure the stress of being shot at on a daily basis and put in a 12-hour day outside on duty. Just come stand outside with me for a few hours. Just walk to the dining facility at lunch or the sleep area with me. I assure you that you will find areas where it does indeed get above 130 degrees during the day. And you too will become irritated when you get home and some smarmy techno-geek tries to tell you that it only "officially" got up to 107 degrees while you were here.