enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 7 (92 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Roman Polanski and the Dream Factory
by Inkberrow
+6 Reply

I've been on the Universal Studios tour, and listened up, and I've certainly been to umpteen movies. Maybe Robert Osborne says it a couple of times a day on TCM; maybe a Mayer or a Selznick coined the phrase in 1928 or something. Somebody here knows its derivation, I'm sure. Whatever its origin, one of the dominant and most beloved tropes describing early Hollywood as well as today's film/teevee entertainment biz is, "The Dream Factory". Whatever the human imagination could wish for, whatever dreams or fantasies---or nightmares---delight and haunt the human consciousness, the Biz can render them into clean, safe portions of fluffy escapist fare, or maybe challenging, alien stews, but all with a comfortingly pre-determined beginning, middle, and end, like an amusement park thrillride. All facets of visual and textual artistry are brought to bear in filmmaking, with the most talented wordsmiths, designers, performers, and technicians able to turn a backlot into a den of Ali Baba so real that one must pinch oneself, to make sure it's not a.....dream.

Quickly the money, fame, power, and influence generated by the Biz exceeded even the wildest dreams of the early moguls and performers, and for the most part it's all only increased up to the present day. Naturally such an industry has attracted the most talented actors and performers---sorry---the best looking of the most talented actors and performers, along with the most ambitious and driven of the other Dream Factory worker cadre. Since the beginning of recorded time, artists and performers have consistently proven more experimental, rebellious, unconventional, risk-taking, or "liberal"-minded, shall we say, than common sorts, in terms of lifestyle choices, leisure activities, and especially in terms of deference or lack thereof to socio-political and sexual mores then prevailing among "average" folks. Moneymen and powerbrokers of all times and places have eagerly demonstrated this special entitlement mentality, especially where conventional sexual mores are concerned, perhaps most pithily captured by Mel Brooks in History Of The World Part I..... yes, "it's good to be the King".

From Fatty Arbuckle to Lindsay Lohan, self-directed, often destructive or exploitative licentiousness has predominated among workers at the Factory, even as the Factory has always sought to provide reactionary comfort food to the masses alongside daring experimental dishes. "Hollywood" is and has always been a Party Place, where anything can happen behind the scenes as well as under the lights---and frequently the former is more shocking than the former. This dynamic is only natural for those who comprise the Dream Factory, because they themselves came there to turn their own wishes and dreams into immediate reality as well. The fruits of imagination, ambition, greed, power and control, narcissism, and pleasure are grown, plucked, and devoured from the same Dream Factory trees. Crucial personal validation for writers and performers can be had on a grand scale, as on AND off screen those limit-setting hometown naysayers are proven to be provincial and wrongheaded about Our Boy. This particular heretofore-misunderstood demographic can be revealed as heroes; that heretofore-celebrated institution or social convention can have its long-warranted comeuppance; and, especially important for Factory workers over the years, unconventional or deviant sexuality can be explored without tiresome judgement, at least off-screen, and increasingly on screen as well. Homosexuality, for instance, may indeed be just another facet of "normality", but the flag was raised in Hollywood, first with concerted off-screen tolerance, and then with the latter-day on-screen cause led by Factory homosexuals, writing and producing major social validation pieces like Philadelphia and Angels In America......which then gave way to TransAmerica. "Those people who called me and my friends 'different' in Bumswab, Nebraska, will themselves be considered society's freaks when we're done", goes the validation narrative behind countless scripts and minor subplot additions from resentful, self-righteous Factory narcissists.

Most often, in my view anyway, the Dream Factory worker's validation-entitlement quest is quite personal, quite self-referential, not redolent of larger concerns for others, despite appearances. Whatever issue or topic du jour comes down the pike, it's more of an adopted affectation for Workers, especially actors, many of the the best of whom, in the world of Method anyway, are empty-headed vessels looking for something Meaningful with which to fill their gourds [read: Sean Penn]. Cocaine or Communism, it's about striking a cutting-edge pose---so long as it remains pleasurable and convenient. Many Factory useful idiots found out that cocktail party dabbling in "Balance of Power" and "Bad America" nostrums was quite inconvenient for their careers, as post-WWII America sought to assess Stalin's reach at home and abroad in the nascent Atomic Age. One gets the sense from the deluge of Dream Factory mewling about the "Red Scare" and HUAC ever since, that the ethics or merits of their own actions, or HUAC's, were irrelevant, along with actual geo-political realities, at least compared with the sheer inconvenience and indignity of having preferences, careers, and Personal Validation Narratives, interrupted with impertinent (to them) inquiries concerning the nation's domestic security. The very Idea of asking them to explain themselves!

Roman Polanski is angry and indignant as well right now, and so is the Dream Factory on his behalf. The script of his Life Movie is not supposed to tend this way, though of course there's still hope this jailing could turn out to be his Last Obstacle before well-deserved redemption, in the faces of mean-spirited, law enforcement bureaucrats who've never had an orgasm. Polanski and other Dream Factory denizens have already visualized a ten-minute standing ovation for Our Hero at the Kodak Theater on Oscar night next January, perhaps as a sort of normative bookend to the courageous shunning so many of them delivered to Elia Kazan because Kazan put truth and America's security before Factory loyalty in the time of maximal existential danger to this nation's survival in her short history. "Heroical Victim and Survivor and Triumphant Artist" is the desired theme of the Polanski Life Movie. No room for tiresome, inconvenient consequences for a long-passed sequence of events, events of minor "One Friday Night In The Groovy Seventies" significance to Polanski. These are, after all, narrative events of which he, Polanski, is the true victim, given his misbegotten exile as an importance Artiste from America.......as compared to the pedestrian, largely-theoretical sufferings of a long-ago recompensed cipher-woman who was pimped to him by her Hollywood mom as Factory fodder per long-established Factory rights and privileges. For the Biz, the Factory, Polanski's oeuvre far outweighs any other consideration at this juncture, because in the Dream Factory, some pigs are manifestly more equal than others, and things like the law, and personal responsibility, and sacrifice, and the dignity of "little" people, are contingent, elective, exigent concepts for the Personal-Reality Makers of the Dream Factory

I bow to the master.
by Gatewood

Powerful stuff.

The only thing, however, is that I haven't yet read or seen all that much about the liberals crying salty tears over Polanski's legal problems. I may have just missed it or they may be waiting for the dramatic moment when he gets returned to American soil in shackles.

Hmmmm . . . of course, I am looking forward to that moment myself. The moral of the story is . . . don't diddle thirteen year old girls. It's something that ACORN should take to heart as well.

It will take longer
by artandsoul

than a moment to formulate a response to match your terrific post. But I did want to say that you did a wonderful job here. It is a painful paradox: the celebrity culture of our society.

A culture and a people lost at sea. And it is no surprise that we find ourselves in these kinds of tawdry conundrums.

Well done. Much too well done for this venue, but well done. If you repost this in another Fray you would probably get a (much-deserved) checkmark.

"i have a dream . . ."
by baltimore aureole
channelling roman polanski's thoughts . . . "i have a drream - of 13 year old girls especially if they're drugged or drunk. i'm such a control freak i can't be attracted to women my own age, who make love out of consent. i couldn't stand the rejection if one said no. so i prey on the most helpless in society, who haven't formed the mental capacity to say no, and then i ply them with liquor and drugs just to make sure."
wadda lada hooey
by Schadenfreude

They're just more visible rich people.

Re: Well, do what you always do.
by Lono

No stinkin' libruls crying over Polanski? Invent them! It's really what you do best, you know...just pretend they exist so you can then tar and feather real libruls based on what the imaginary libruls are saying and doing in your mind.


Why?
by artandsoul

Why take a perfectly legitimate speech by Martin Luther King and twist it into a sick representation of a sick white man's mind?

Not a single other phrase in all of the English language that you could bring to mind to make the play on words and images here?

Blech.

You're so deep [eom]
by MitchK
.
thanks.
by Isonomist
I couldn't believe my eyes when Debra Winger spoke out in his defense. Holy. Shit. Can't contest your point about the mass narcissism that it requires to defend this guy.
Re: "i have a dream . . ."
by LaurieAnnM

consider yourself spanked by the alanon b-word who likes to try to play judge and jury here on a daily basis ..she likes to try to dish it out but doesn't like it coming back on her.

ie : Below, she defended her demeaning a revered picture of an artist's drawing from AA (even as she claims to be a 12 step alanon who should respect such revered items) and suggested it was just a funny little joke. Now ,here she is, ironically enough, chatising you for your satirical use of MLK's words.

I suggest both may be in poor taste..but really, the hypocrisy of a&s,is startling.

Re: thanks.
by LaurieAnnM

I saw that, too. I just don't get those that place talent above morality.

as a culture we do it all the time.
by Isonomist

Name a famous artist. Name a genius scientist. Name a best-selling author, musician, politician, scholar, preacher.

Polanski belonged in jail for what he did, and deserves to serve more time for fleeing. I don't care if the girl forgives him, is over it, whatever she says. That doesn't make it okay.

boy, am i ever chastised !!
by baltimore aureole

i guess you told me. MLK's remarks are sacred, and can never, ever be referred to in any other context, eh?

why? are his words more protected than those of ghandi, jesus, mohammed, JFK, obama . . . ?

on what basis? your personal preference?

yeah but
by Isonomist
this one made the mistake of thumbing his nose across an ocean at the LA DA. You know, he asked for it, your honor. He must like it.
No, his words aren't sacred.
by artandsoul

You can freely profane them. I'm not suggesting you be arrested.

I was wondering why you chose those particular words to "gaze" into the mind of a sick, pedophilic bastard?

Got moron?

Page 1 of 7 (92 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML