enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
High Fructose Corn Syrup Not Deadly
by aerickson

The comments of Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. during the September 12 Great Presidential Mashup (<link>) suggesting that high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a unique contributor to health problems is misleading.

HFCS, like table sugar and honey, is composed of fructose and glucose, which are found in many other naturally-occurring foods. Since 1983, the Food and Drug Administration has listed HFCS as “Generally Recognized as Safe” (known as GRAS status) for use in food.

Several press reports have pointed to HFCS as a ‘unique’ cause of obesity. This assertion lacks scientific merit. In fact, Dr. Walter Willett, Harvard School of Public Health Nutrition Department Chairman, told The New York Times, “There's no substantial evidence to support the idea that high-fructose corn syrup is somehow responsible for obesity.”

There have also been several misguided reports claiming that the body processes HFCS differently than other sugars. New research shows that HFCS is metabolized similar to sugar. Kathleen J Melanson, et al. at Rhode Island University recently reviewed the effects of HFCS and sucrose on circulating levels of glucose, leptin, insulin and ghrelin in a study group of lean women. The study found “no differences in the metabolic effects” of HFCS and sucrose (Nutrition 23(2):103-12).

HFCS can be enjoyed as part of a healthy, balanced diet. According to the American Dietetic Association, “Consumers can safely enjoy a range of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners when consumed in a diet that is guided by current federal nutrition recommendations ... as well as individual health goals.”

Audrae Erickson

President

Corn Refiners Association

Re: High Fructose Corn Syrup Not Deadly
by bill verbano
Wow, how reassuring to know that the corn syrup lobby is so quick with a smackdown on the pages of Slate. Can't have any aspersions cast so carelessly now, can we?
Thanks for your honesty.
by Wolfen

At least in admitting who you are. Too many partisans like yourself fail to identify their background, thereby demonstrating that there might be a bit of bias to your position. Your positions on the source of your income are understandable and I can see why you'd be upset with Senator Biden.

But the weight of scientific authority is clearly on his side.

Wikipedia angle?
by Wolfen
Who wants to bet that Ms. Erickson has spent some time editting Wikipedia regarding HFCS?
View as RSS news feed in XML