You know symp:
1] All of the statements I make are either backed up by hard statistics or by the historical record. [i.e.; I can read the history of the Mountain Meadows massacre, I don't need mormon historians 'interpreting' it for me.]
2] Statistically, Mormons divorce at EXACTLY the same rate as non-Mormons. [http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_divo.htm}
3] If you are talking about this PEW study –
<link> It said nothing about "incredibly high rate of adherence to church principles and religiosity amoung church members." The study dealt exclusively with how mormons are viewed by others. It said nothing about 'rate of adherence to church principles' or 'incredibly high rate of adherence to church principles' or 'relgiosity' amoung mormons.
If you are talking about this PEW study -
<link>
As far as being more religious than other denominations the study showed that mormons' religion were no more important to them than the religion of evangelical, historically black Protestant faiths and Jehovah's Witnesses.
mormon's belief in God and in the bible is higher than in other groups, however, I am not sure how relevant this question is to the issue at hand. It asks someone about an entirely subjective matter and then relates the results of the answers in a statistical manner. Nor does it show, empirically, that people who have a strong belief in the bible are 'good people' or willing to act in a more socially acceptable manner. In fact, it says nothing at all about people.
The study showed that less mormons attend church on a weekly basis than Jehovah's Witnesses.
57% of mormons said their's was the one true faith, but 39% said it wasn't.
68% of mormons feel there is more than one way to practice their faith.
I could go on, but you get the idea. Nowhere in this study are the words, "about 'rate of adherence to church principles' or 'incredibly high rate of adherence to church principles' or 'relgiosity' amoung mormons" used. Your statements may be your interpretation of what the study says, but they are no more valid than anyone else's interpretation of the study.
In the end, PEW studies are mere polls. They deal entirely with subjective criteria. There is, in fact, no way to obtain a statistically significant sample of answers to these questions that are not subjective. Therefore, their value is questionable.
4] Religiosity is defined as "1. the quality of being religious; piety; devoutness.
2. affected or excessive devotion to religion." Religion is defined as "something one believes in and follows devotedly" [Thanks, Dictionary.com]
One can watch the same TV program "religiously." One can perform exercises "religiously." Et cetera. A person's religiosity saws nothing about the value of their belief system or the 'goodness' of their character. It simply says one pays a great deal of attention to doing one thing over and over, again. I don't know how 'religious' mormons are, as a whole, but being devout to their religion does not make them 'good people' and it has nothing to do with whether their belief system is 'right,' 'correct,' 'real' or the 'best of all religions.'
Elizabeth Clare Prophet's followers were so devoted to their religion, (the I AM ascended masters), that they, willingly, gave her all their money; moved to Corwin Springs, MT.; spent over a million dollars building bomb shelters; and crawled into them on the date and time she said the world would be destroyed in a nuclear holocaust. Probably, both you and I would think that ECP's followers were 'devout' and 'religious' in their beliefs and their practice of their beliefs was frequent. At the same time, we both can think her followers where deranged in how they behaved as a result of their devotion. [Read her Wikipedia page about fall out shelters:
<link> [By the way, the bomb shelters are still there, Elizabeth Clare Prophet is not.]
Devotion to a set of beliefs does not make one person better than another. Nor does it say anything about the validity of the belief.
4] About 'besmirching' mormons. I could care less than zero that you feel I am 'besmirching' mormons. I am not. I am, merely, pointing out the more ridiculous points written about in the Slate article and, subsequently, made by posters about mormonism
5] You are besmirching me by calling my factual based statements as 'dubious assertions.' As far as my own experiences with members of your cult, they are my experiences. Nothing more, northing less. Unless you were there and inside my head, which I doubt, you cannot offer anything useful about them.
6] You have failed to provide one scintilla of "empirical evidence" backing up your statements.
We disagree. I think your religion is a cult, with factually demonstrated damaging psychosocial sequela.
You do not.
I think that reflects a serious lack of judgment on your part. You probably think the same about me.
That's great. This is what America is about.