what will happen when a 65 year old is refused a life saving procedure because some young punks in Washington think he or she is "too old"!

first off Mr. "liberal" that isn't what's going to happen. Secondly, that's right. What right does anyone have to say we shouldn't spend 200 thousand dollars a person on 65-80 year olds to increase their life by 1 miserable year, and 0 on these "young punks"?