I've always thought Zooey Deschanel was a very cute and talented young lady, but big sister Emily totally blows her away:

<link>

<link>

Zooey is cute but not really "sexy" - she has kind a distracted, airheaded look (although I'm sure she's perfectly smart in fact). Emily looks more sex-ready, like she can really focus on the task at hand.

I have to disagree, man. Emily is totally cute, but Zooey makes me dizzy. She has that quirky, everygirl (but hotter) look that I really like. Emily is too mannequinish. Also, I'm glad that they're giving her characters that are a little less sarcastic and nihilistic. Regardless, I could stare at her all day, in a non-creepy way, that is.

I'd have to agree. Emily pulls out some stunning shots, but not that many. Zooey has like thirty or fourty different angles and expressions that all work really well.

<link>

Really. Well, hey, everyone has their own taste. Personally, I'm not to into "quirky."

At any rate, they have to be the hottest sister pair in show business. They totally slaughter the Olsen twins.

Olsen twins are trashy little munchkins. I don't get the appeal at all.

I don't really think quirky is the right word... Maybe for a few of her roles, but she's a good actress. In real life I think it's more of a chameleon quality. Zooey really can look about 50 different ways, but Emily always looks like porcelain, like a grown-up Kristen Stewart.

And no one has even mentioned another factor that totally gives the edge to Zooey -- looks aside, she has an absolutely beeyoootiful singing voice.

"Olsen twins are trashy little munchkins"

That IS the attraction. Have you never had a trashy little Munchkin girlfriend?

Don't believe I've ever heard her sing. But a good voice is sexy, so that's cool.

I would still take Emily. Zooey (while I agree she's quite cute and charming) looks a little fragile. Emily looks more like she could brace herself really good, and just take it.

I'd never heard of Kristen Stewart but I just looked her up and she's pretty damn fine too. And apparently newly single.

Munich:

I've always thought Zooey Deschanel was a very cute and talented young lady, but big sister Emily totally blows her away:

<link>

<link>

Zooey is cute but not really "sexy" - she has kind a distracted, airheaded look (although I'm sure she's perfectly smart in fact). Emily looks more sex-ready, like she can really focus on the task at hand.

WRONG!

I know that attractiveness is "subjective," in the eye of the beyholder, yada yada. But you are just plain wrong. Second girl is not attractive at all. Look at the spacing between her eyes. Way off there. She definitely looks like a victim of fetal alcohol syndrome.

You are just being conned by the magic of makeup. Now go forth and fix your mental state so that you don't accidentally prefer an ugly woman again.

That was overly harsh.

Quite frankly, the space between the eyes are God's work and I love God, hence shut up.

Munich:

Don't believe I've ever heard her sing. But a good voice is sexy, so that's cool.

I would still take Emily. Zooey (while I agree she's quite cute and charming) looks a little fragile. Emily looks more like she could brace herself really good, and just take it.

I'd never heard of Kristen Stewart but I just looked her up and she's pretty damn fine too. And apparently newly single.

Watch Twilight and tell me what think of Stewart. Her acting was so abysmal in that movie that I'm not sure she can act at all. Pretty girl, baaaaaaaaaad actress. Yeah, the movie's writing was crappy and the source material was crappy, but her acting was foul.

Pattinson did no better, so I'm not discriminating based on gender.