there’s a huge demand for blondes and blue eyes in asia and the middle east. They also have stereotypes about us (believe me). Naturally, when the moors invaded spain and sicily some centuries ago, there was sexual exploitation of the females of the conquered group and the same when different asian groups conquered different caucasian groups in russia and other eastern europeans parts.

This is human behavior. It is not confined to one group.

today in the EU, most rapists of all women including white women are defined as non-european men. their excuse is that the native females are all hos (look at how they dress and act after all).

libs, since the aim is to promote non racism and liberalism (I guess that is your aim and I certainly am in sympathy with it ) don't you think you should give up the white man as devil scenario?

today in the EU, most rapists of all women including white women are defined as non-european men.

Could you provide a source for that, please, and link to it? Preferably a government-run site, and not a private sector site which may have an agenda to promote....

Thanks in advance.

Seriously, it sounds like fearmongering you'd read from national front sites :O

Ugh.

Disregarding the fact that lots of non-whites hold blonde hair and blue eyes as a standard of beauty due to western media and cultural saturation, your post was basically just a big justification for the whole "forgive and forget" tactic of Western revisionist history.

Look, I know a lot of caucasians are tired of being blamed for all of the world's ills, but that doesn't mean that the entire world can just erase the fact that European and American economic and political ambitions seriously crapped on the "non-white" cultures of the world and is a direct or indirect cause for arguably 95% of the world's current major conflicts and crises.

Who was it that said that only by forgetting the mistakes of our past are we condemned to repeat them in the future?

yfunk3:

Look, I know a lot of caucasians are tired of being blamed for all of the world's ills, but that doesn't mean that the entire world can just erase the fact that European and American economic and political ambitions seriously crapped on the "non-white" cultures of the world and is a direct or indirect cause for arguably 95% of the world's current major conflicts and crises.

Western Imperialism is an indirect cause for 100% of the world's current major conflicts and crises -- in the same sense that, according to catastrophe theory, a falling leaf in Vermont can trigger a hurricane in Bolivia.

The fact is, before the West had the power to seriously crap on the "non-white" cultures of the world, the "non-white" cultures of the world took every opportunity to crap on the white cultures. For example, Europe did not begin colonizing the Middle East and North Africa until Napolian's conquests. In the years immediately prior, Barbary pirates from North Africa would capture European sailing ships, selling the surrendered travelers into slavery. (Even before the Western media forced Western standards of beauty upon the rest of the world, young blond slave-girls commanded a premium price from shiekhs looking to replenish their harems.)

In fact, the word "slave" comes from the same root as "Slav" (as in, a speaker of one of the Slavic languages). That is because central government came late to the slavic nations, and for a number of centuries (especially before ships became sufficiently sea-worthy to follow the African coast) eastern Europe / western Asia was a prime hunting ground for Arab slave traders.

The curous question is why Leftists are so eager to uncover the sins of the West, while so reluctant to see them in the context of sh*tty behavior throughout the _entire_ globe.

yfunk3:

Ugh.

Disregarding the fact that lots of non-whites hold blonde hair and blue eyes as a standard of beauty due to western media and cultural saturation, your post was basically just a big justification for the whole "forgive and forget" tactic of Western revisionist history.

I do agree about the original post but judging from my experiences of dealing with our Japanese cohorts when my previous employer was bought out, upper class Japanese businessmen are just as obsessed with white American woman as my fellow enlisted soldiers were with "exotic" women way back when I was in the service a few decades ago. Our Japanese colleagues spent a sickeningly amount of money at strip bars when they came over to inspect our operations; they definitely had enough money to get whatever special treatment they wanted.

I'm just not convinced that the obsession with the opposite sex of anothers race is actually historical. I think it has more to do with sex often being linked to power or money and an inherent "sexiness" of someone that's considered exotic or otherwise off limits (different race, religion, culture, etc.).

Sex is linked to power and money in the sense that men who had power or money have traditionally been better able to get it.

I agree, and also, with such a role model, your offspring would also have those abilities.

KB01, on the other hand, I think your theory of the taboo in miscegenation is flat-out wrong. What is that? I've never had one of THOSE, let me try? Kind of archaic. It's more likely inspired I think when one party or both surmise that their own gene-pool is far too limited, so to increase the possiblity of success for their offspring, they look for expansion of that gene pool.

fsilber:

For example, Europe did not begin colonizing the Middle East and North Africa until Napolian's conquests.

Ever hear of the Romans or the Crusades?