I did not have sex with that man!

Maybe a few others, and a page or two, but not with that police officer.

Senator (for now) Craig has an easy solution to his problem. If he would like to remain in the Senate, with its power and perks, here's all he has to do. Become a democrat, move to Mass. (Barney Frank will help), and come out of the closet. Renounce his church, his family, the NRA, Idaho, all his conservative friends and affiliations. Maybe march in some gay pride parades with Hillary. He could become a born again left winger. The democrat party could parade him around as the reformed, prodigal son who has seen the light and returned to the righteousness of liberalism. After awhile he could run again from the state of Mass., possibly replacing the moribund Ted Kennedy. Think about it Larry.

So El, what you're suggesting is that Larry should be HONEST for a change, but he shouldn't try to run for office as the New Honest Larry in Idaho, but should instead move to Massachusets, and why? Because Massachusets has a history of supporting honest politicians? Is THAT what you're saying, Bubbi?

Exactly Melvyl! Honest politicians..... like Chappaquidick Ted Kennedy and Barney "I'm running a male prostitution ring from my apartment" Frank. I can't get anything by you Massachusettians!

RIGHT -- this isn't about Larry Craig soliciting for sex in toilets, nope! It isn't about his hypicrisy, not at all! It isn't about hislies, no no no! It's about Barney Frank. Or not. Look, asswipe, Barney Frank has carried his own weight for years. He took his case to the voters and got reelected. Larry is free to do the same. Apparently, his little pals in the republican Caucus don't think he can make it work, which is why they're pressuring him to resign. ALL the pressure he's getting is from his own kind: reactionary, hypocritical bigots and whores, just like him.

A lot of name calling in that last post Melvyl. I guess that's your idea of a reasoned, logical debate. Anyway, you just made my case for why Larry should move to Mass. and go Bolshevik.

are the happening place to be, not Massachussetts. Maybe Rev Ted, Larry Craig and Mark Foley can squeeze you in!

Your mention of Chappaquidick, "Democrat party", Barney Frank, going "Bolshevik" are the tells of a "reasoned, logical debate". You get extra points for not blaming Craig's behavior on Bill Clinton or even mentioning Monica.

What the hell would you know about reason and logic?Reread your post again .

Melvyl said that Mass. has a track record of supporting honest politicians. I replied, like Ted Kennedy and Barney Frank. Seems logical enough. Larry will not get a pass in Idaho. But the voters of Mass.have overlooked these kind of things in the past. Again seems logical. Therefore, Larry may have a future in Mass. And there was a lot of name calling in his post. I do believe there is a lot of Republican hypocrisy and I never liked blaming everything on Bill Clinton. However, the name calling needs to stop, and I doubt very much you would do it to my face.

Name calling? Gosh, when did you get so sensitive? Apparently you think that even after Foley and Craig are outed, fag-baiting is still a go-to stance (a broad one, mind you) for GOP hacks, such as yourself. Ah, but so touchy AND threatening. You doubt I'd respond in kind to you TO YOUR FACE, and why not? Surliness and threats, when just a couple of posts ago you were so happy and overbearing! Adjusting to this new LOSER identity of yours seems to be wearing on your psyche. Try Prozac.

Melvyl, you need the psychotropic drugs. And you still have not explained why Larry could not have a future in Mass. if he espoused suitable positions on the issues to the voters. Hey, and I still am happy..... LOSER!

Alright everyone, time to go home... the internet is over.

Melvyl, shut up.

Thank you, Germloucks........couldn't of said it better myself.

So Blowhard Boy goes free? Fine, until next time, Let the Eagle Sore.

Hey Molehill, eagles SOAR. You are more like a herpes sore.