enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Calm before the storm
by GreenwichJ
-1 Reply

China's economy is a complete mess.

China's export markets have collapsed, and the government is desperately trying to encourage consumption by subsidising big employers to produce stuff that nobody wants. Warehouses are filling up with junk which nobody is buying - because they know they will get better discounts tomorrow. Prices are falling fast.

The consumption stimulus is working for now, as shown by the sudden interest of the Chinese consumer in American products. But it won't last, because the Chinese still lack a social security network. Saving, not spending, is the only thing that keeps the wolf from the door. Those savings have to be invested, but there are very few good investment options.

Of course, China might have developed a social security system were it governed by democrats who shared the concerns of the common man. Instead, the communist party continues to blow money on infrastructure white-elephants and moribund factories. The Party is terrified that millions of disgruntled ex-factory workers will do in 2009 what students failed to do at Tiananmen twenty years ago. China has a weak political system that cannot cope with economic pain, so it is sedating itself in the hope the illness somehow disappears. It won't work.

Re: Calm before the storm
by Ronin8318

China has a social security system, but it is limited to the rich provinces.

The idea that unemployed workers can bring down the government in a mass rally does not pass the 'laugh' test - the Chinese military have no qualm in suppressing rioting adults. The Tiananmen Square was different because it's lead by University students. The real challenge to Chinese rule will comes from the conflict between the coastal and inner provinces, with the former being much richer than the latter.

Re: Calm before the storm
by Eigenvector

I rated this a "not recommended" thread even though you got a checkmark. It was provacative reading to be sure - but not a shred of evidence to back up your claims.

It would appear Slate's checkmark system is just as broken as it ever was.

Re: Calm before the storm
by GreenwichJ
Er, how much evidence would you like?
View as RSS news feed in XML