Re: Impeachment proceedings appear unwarranted
by
higby_higby
09/04/2007, 6:40 PM #
nym:
congress could have, and surely did, approve the six-month trial of TSP and Other Covert Programs for reasons other than that they agreed with the president. the fact that Pelosi got a stopgap passed could indicate anything. one need not conclude anything, surely.
and congress can't pick an AAG, but it sure can oversee the Department. last clause of article I, section 8.
and "the experience with President Nixon" you're thinking of is the resignation of John Mitchell and Nixon's firing of Archibald Cox, right? the independent counsel statute is there to check the executive -- like when the AG is a crook, and the president fires his successor -- not to impede impeachment proceedings. and an independent counsel can go right ahead with its investigation alongside impeachment. no problem there.
impeachment is long overdue. politics will disrupt the process, but Fein's point, clearly, is that a prima facie case has been made for impeachment by the president himself. as soon as he says, "I authorized the NSA to conduct electronic eavesdropping outside the purview of FISA," that's game over. that admission is enough to convene a grand jury.
and again, whatever the outcome -- no indictments, no impeachment, no resignation -- at a bare minimum we need some questions answered about what has been going on in this country over the past six years. we need to learn the rationale for the blanket executive privilege claims covering former administration officials, the abuse of signing statements, National Security letters, etc.
the executive has claimed legal acreage that Congress hasn't measured yet, much less put in check. impeachment focuses the larger process of shaping the legal terrain. otherwise, Congress has a half-dozen investigations into penny-ante indiscretions.
and for everyone who wants to give the men an invitation to the Hague, stringing him up on FISA is half a loaf. selah.
hh