enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Not the Irish?
by student_on_the_rebound

While I think your article makes good points about the need to get rid of erosive sterotypes Americans and Mexicians hold against each other, your need to make Mexician immigrants "special" really pokes holes in your credibility.

All immigrants throughout American history have been subjected to harassment in some form or another, even if the labor industry welcomed them with open arms. Signs were posted in shops, "Irish Need Not Apply." Being Irish was not always fashionable. (This is lame, referencing wikipedia, but I just don't have the strength for peer-reviewed research right now: <link>.)

Racism against German immigrants was especially high, even before the explosion of WW1 and 2. Prohibition was a special blow against German-American communities; beer and town hall gatherings were part of their deeply ingrained culture.

And my gosh, do we even want to touch on Japanese immigrants, whom were placed in CAMPS during WW2? And these were legitimate, legal immigrants, citizens of the United States.

There has always been pressure to assimilate into the culture that one is joining. Perhaps some of the rancor against Mexician-American immigrants is the perceived (and sometimes published) threat that they're simply moving Mexico into America, instead of becoming assimilated American citizens. I grew up in a Wisconsin community, went to school with 2nd and 3rd generations where Norwegian was still used sparingly among grandparents, and being told in school we MUST learn Spanish (I was told specifically it was idiotic to take French) because we'll soon be speaking it anyway, when our grandparents worked hard to become Americans while still retaining their heritage, rubbed the scar a little raw.

Re: Not the Irish?
by Marie4isu

Thank you, thank you!! My maternal great-grandmother was an Irish immigrant and my paternal grandparents were Swedish immigrants. I married a German immigrant (as a child). I have never firgured out why the Swedish immigrants were much better "received" than others. I too grew up in a Scandanivain town where Swedish was used for at least one Sunday a month in Luthern church service. I, as many of my classmates, knew a little Swedish, enjoyed Swedish food (blood pudding and all!), and celebrated Swedish customs in their homes. At my maternal grandmother's house, I was exposed to Irish foods, customs, etc.

My aunts raved on and on about injustices to the Irish people (certainly accounts they'd heard as children from their grandmother or mother). Don't even start with my mother-in-law!!! I can't even get information about the circumstances or even date of immigration. My husband was sent every summer to live near-by with her parents who only spoke German, to learn the language and culture "better".

Wake up, United States! We share a border with Mexico. We took a huge chunk of their country by force. Any U.S. citizen who refers to themselves as Americans against Mexican immigrants need to get their GED! Mexicans and Canadians are just as much Americans as U.S. citizens. We are all Americans!

Re: Not the Irish?
by Island Muffin

The Irish entered the US legally.

The Irish don’t demand other peoples’ money. In fact, The Irish, support individual liberty.

The Irish don’t force the US into becoming bi-lingual, but assimilated.

The Irish are better looking than the English and Germans.

Mexicans and Canadians are just as much Americans as U.S. citizens. We are all Americans.”

No. Mexicans are Mexicans, who created Mexico, who could live in Mexico, instead of violating US immigration laws. There are more Latinos in America than there are Canadians in Canada. The sheer number of highly fertile law breakers makes Mexican immigration different. Finally, the educational attainment of Mexican migrants (especially Central American immigrants) is considerably lower than the American average (and the Irish do better than theAmerican average), and Latinos remain culturally resistant to education for generations. Therefore, Mexicans will require more taxpayer supported social services in perpetuity.

Mexican poverty is now American poverty.

Re: Not the Irish?
by Marie4isu

Mr./Ms. Muffin (okay, I know that you're Mr. Muffin with a few AKA's)

"The Irish entered the US legally."

Yes, they did and for different reasons from any immigrents (that I know of). They were literally dying in their homeland, with neighbors covering windows so others would not witness the family's deaths. They were starving to death because of racial and political persecution. They didn't traverse miles on foot, they spent 2-3 months on ships lower decks with insufficient water, food, and toilets, often rarely seeing sunlight and never breathing fresh air. Sometimes only 1/2 of them arrived alive from these death or "coffin" ships. Oh, yes, I forgot, they were legal! They were welcomed in the U.S. by muscular men who insisted on taking them to their new housing (very over-priced). They landed in Boston and New York City with no means of traveling elsewhere. They arrived with no resources, no education and illiterate. They were ignorant of plumbing and running water. Many Irish arrived as indentured servants -- on the same voyages described above. At least they had employment (without benefit of days off or any pay for years). All servants in the U.S. were blacks and Irish.

Irish were called "white niggers" and not allowed in most restaurants or hotels (not that they could afford them). Anti-Irish statements also appeared on many advertisements for workers, "Irish need not apply". The majority of Irish started life in the U.S. by begging on streets just to pay for a single tenant room that would hold 5-10 of them. Irish men could only find work doing what U.S. citizens didn't want to do, mining, laying rail and digging canals. If any person of any color or background worked beside them, they earned far more for the same job as the Irish. Irish were labeled, stupid (illiterate), dirty, and lazy.

"The Irish don’t demand other peoples’ money. In fact, The Irish, support individual liberty."

No, they didn't demand other peoples' money, except for the gangs that immigrating males formed when no work could be found and they were forced live in shanties, piled like cord wood in tennaments or in cellars. Most begged for money for a time after arrival. Indentured workers didn't demand money -- they recieved none, only passage on a death ship and suffering marginalization. Men didn't demand money because when they applied for hard labor jobs as advertized and rebelled against the wage being lowered, officials forced them to accept the job with lower wages. Of course, they supported individual liberty, this was a reason for emmigration. Irish also remained primarily Irish with their hearts in Ireland and hatred against the English!

Irish were widely criticized for bringing their poverty to the U.S., causing more poverty and lower living conditions in the U.S. Also, news article and citizens shouted that crime would end if the Irish were sent back to Ireland.

"The Irish don’t force the US into becoming bi-lingual, but assimilated."

Everyone knows that the Irish were probably the most hated legal immigrents yet the only ones who spoke English. Go figure!

Me: “Mexicans and Canadians are just as much Americans as U.S. citizens. We are all Americans.”

You: "No. Mexicans are Mexicans, who created Mexico, who could live in Mexico, instead of violating US immigration laws. There are more Latinos in America than there are Canadians in Canada. The sheer number of highly fertile law breakers makes Mexican immigration different. Finally, the educational attainment of Mexican migrants (especially Central American immigrants) is considerably lower than the American average (and the Irish do better than theAmerican average), and Latinos remain culturally resistant to education for generations. Therefore, Mexicans will require more taxpayer supported social services in perpetuity.

Mexicans are Mexicans. U.S. citizens are U.S. citizens. Canadians are Canadians. All are Amercians. Check it out on-line -- ask for a map of America. In fact, to be more specific we are North Americans, not Central Americans and not South Americans. Mexicans have just as much right saying that they're Americans than someone living in Minneapolis or Alberta. I did not say that we were equals in any way except that we live on the same continent, America.

Birth rates of 221 countries places the U.S. at #151 with a 14.18% and Mexico at #105 with a 20.04%. Mexico does have a higher birth rate, with 105 countries with higher birth rates and 70 lower. The U.S. has a birth rate with 151 countries with higher rates and 116 countries lower. The mean is at 110. Looks like the U.S. could be considered by highly fertile by 70 countries on the list, some of which limit citizens to one or two children. The infant mortality rate for Mexicans is over 91/2%. Considering that large numbers of Mexicans live in largely populated areas and have a very low mortality rate, rural Mexicans never go to hospitals and are likely to have infant mortality rates closer to 25%.

My material great-grandmother and her people were illiterate when they immigrated. Every cultural group remains resisitent to assimilation. Most were forced to assimilate American culture just to get jobs or get better pay. This has always taken at least a generation if not two or three. I'm third generation Irish and second generation Swedish and have taught my daughter and granddaughter very well in both cultures. My granddaughter thinks that she's Irish and Swedish -- doesn't even know her father's heritage. The Irish will live forever, regardless of where we live! Although the Irish arrived with nothing and often in servitude for a number of years, illiterate, uneducated, and (according to U.S. citizens) dirty, lazy and stupid. I don't think that it's perpetuity, yet, we've had at least three Irish presidents and no one talks about Irish poverty bringing it to the shores here nor even wants to send us all back to Ireland.

Perhaps there is a little closer parallel that you, the expert on Mexico and Mexican immigrents is willing to admit.

Re: Not the Irish?
by Island Muffin

You feel that violating immigration laws is justified if you have a good reason. Your camparitive fertility statistics do no discount the fact that the Latino population has expanded from 2 to 40 million in the last three decades, primarily because of illegal immigration coupled with higher fertility rates.

And you seem to feel no group was more hated than the Irish; however, I wanted you to address the fact that Irish are better looking than Anglos. However, hating the Irish is no justification to excuse the violation of our immigration and forgery laws.

Did you know that South Americans are Americans too? So what? You should know that residents of the USA are commonly called Americans? Don’t fake ignorance.

View as RSS news feed in XML