enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Not Believing the Official Story Makes You a Conspiracy Nut?
by ctcadguy

Because I do not believe fire alone cold bring down steel frame buildings in less than 90 minutes at free fall speeds into thier own footprints I am considered a nut?

Because I believe that jet fuel or hydrogen fueled fires cannot melt steel, I am considered a Nut? Remember the tons of molten steel being brought up from the sub-basement SIX weeks later.

Because I do not believe that 19 cavedwellers with box cutters could defeat the NSA, CIA, FBI, NORAD and the US Air Force and hit targets in the most heavily defended air space in the world & against one the most heavily defended buildings in the world (the Pentagon), I am considered a nut?

Who the fuck made up these rules?

Hell I do not even have a theory.

Because I do not believe George Bush's crasy bullshit theory, I am considered a nut?

Re: Not Believing the Official Story Makes You a Conspiracy Nut?
by elemenop2
Not by me,ct. But I don't think we'll ever get the truth.
Re: Not Believing the Official Story Makes You a Conspiracy Nut?
by ctcadguy

I agree.

View as RSS news feed in XML