And, pray, how is this different from most presidencies?
by
buzzerbill
08/28/2007, 11:04 AM #
I've just been reading several books about the Kennedy presidency, and it was characterized by robotically loyal minions in high places. Ditto to any White House you can think of--including Bill Clinton, with an Attorney General who primary purpose was to keep him out of trouble (pace Bobby) and a stable of pit bulls like Rahm Emanuel.
The unfortunate fact is, when the political system becomes envenomed by partisan hatred, a president more and more needs loyalty. Just name me a president who didn't keep advisors who were subpar because of their loyalty. Griffin Bell, anyone?
Our political system has been enmeshed in this problem for nearly 50 years, from Kennedy's blatent lies during the 1960 campaign to Johnson's anti-Goldwater spots to the inept spy tactics of Nikon's team and well into current politics. Consider the trashing of Robert Bork (the beginning of the current cycle), the attempted trashing of Clarence Thomas, the shutdown faceoff between Clinton and the Congress, and now, more recently, a do nothing Congress whose members fancy themselves reincarnations of the Salem Witch Trial judges.
The only solution is a return to civility in our public life, but, judging from the current positioning of the Democrat party, which positions seem to be against everything and for nothing, that seems unlikely in the short term. And no, I do not exclude the lunacies of the religious right from this condemnation.