I don't get it. Another Clintonite? And one with limited intelligence experience? I would have thought that what the CIA needed was someone from within with the integrity and foresight to run the agency as it should be run. Some one who understands the scope of the job and the limits that should be imposed on it for the sake of abiding by the law. There must be some serious career types who resigned, as mentioned in a previous thread, in protest of the Bush administration policies, who would be happy to return and get things right.
Then again, to give Obama the benifit of the doubt, perhaps what the agency needs is someone who can manage effectively, getting the right people to work together for the common good, disallow any law breaking, gettint to the bottom of past misdeeds, read torture, and more importantly, making sure the President gets the straight talk he needs to get in a time of crisis. Panetta doesn't have his career or legacy wrapped up in the intell comunnity to worry about, unlike Tenet.
I must resist hammering the new administration until they are actually in. But, man, It can't happen soon enough. (the swearing in, not the hammering)