Re: "Choice vs. Inborn" is Unfortunate Framing
by
TheyCallMeBruce
11/13/2008, 7:26 PM #
Absolutely. Everyone chooses whether to follow a religion or not, but that doesn't make religious freedom less important. Pedophiles and serial killers don't "choose" to have the overwhelming desires that drive their behavior either, but nobody advocates freedom for them. The difference isn't what is or isn't "chosen," it's what is or isn't so harmful to your fellow citizens that society is not obligated to tolerate it.
A countervailing argument, though, is that racism is wrong in part because it's BS. Science has pretty much debunked the idea of homogenous and strictly defined races as "branches" on the tree of evolution, as well as the innate superiority of some ethnic groups over others. King was saying was to judge people by what really counts, not by superficial divisions. But voluntary or not, the difference between gay and straight is very real and in the area of family and marriage law very relevant. The law treats maternity and paternity different because of fundamental biological differences in those relationships, and the differences between a same-sex and opposite-sex couple are no less real or relevant.