enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
The "economists" didn't understand economics
by anamax

> Economists naturally expected the players to do the rational thing: A would offer the lowest possible amount—$1; and B, knowing $1 was more than zero, would accept.

If you believe that B's goal is to maximize, then accepting $1 is stupid. By refusing amounts less than $7-9, the B population increased their typical return to well over $1.

Re: The "economists" didn't understand economics
by Mangar
Not sure you understand the game. If B refuses the offer, then neither player gets anything at all.
View as RSS news feed in XML