enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
McCain $300 Billion bailout for fat cats
by wobblies

Damn John. You've put out more plans recently than Whoopi changes her clothes during the Oscars: at least she looked nice. Your plan for buying up mortgages is just plain embarrassing.

You want to buy out mortgages at their face value rather than the current market price. <link> <link> It is the lenders that make out in that plan, not distressed home owners who already may benefit from the EESA (if we can figure out how to implement that language <link>). For virtually all mortgages in distress(along with the rest of the housing market), their value has gone down in recent years. If you paid the current market value of those homes (even being flexible about 'mark to market'), your wealthy jet setters would have to take a loss on their loans.

Are you going to underwrite the devalued housing prices for all Americans who's only real asset is their devalued home? I don't think so.

It would have been much easier, if you were really concerned about home owners, if you just helped push the Democratic plan to help grant reduced interest rate packages to home buyers who are struggling with high interest rates. That would have meant taking on your GOP and fat cat buddies, but you didn't want to put on your maverick costume for that. Maybe you'll try that on October 31, Halloween, when you're really desperate.

God Speed,

David

Re: Correction
by wobblies

I wrote in the original post, "It is the lenders that make out in that plan, not distressed home owners...". According to a NY Times article, <link>, included in a later post, the home owner would pay the lower, present value of the home. If that is true, it would be an improvement, but we would not be able to recoup the loss.

I still don't understand why Senator McCain didn't reach across the aisle and support similar proposals by Dems.

God Speed,

David

Re: McCain's plan, from website
by wobblies

Hi~

This is a link to Senator McCain's actual proposal: <link>.

It is remarkable similar to Title I, Sections 109 & 110. Didn't he read the EESA? Does he not also know that the Housing & Economic Recovery Act of 2008 includes similar language in its HOPE program? By the way, the H&ER Act also incorporated language regarding regulatory reform from Senator Hagel's Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005 & 2007: you know, the bill that Senator McCain tries to take credit for.

So, what is new besides his latest stunt?

God Speed,

David

View as RSS news feed in XML