Re: Most of us Jews are not religous.
by
JGC
10/08/2008, 9:40 AM #
"Pretty hard (read: impossible) for me to believe there is no supreme creator of life. Life is far too inscrutable, ordered and amazing for it to have just happened by an infinite number of molecular chance meetings."
>>This is an argument from personal incredulity, a known rhetorical fallacy. But it does beg the question of who or what created the "supreme creator" you believe is repsonsible for life. I mean, that supreme creator must be even more inscrutable ordered and amazing itself than life is, right? No way it could 'just have happened', if life couldn't 'just have happened'.
"Given the above, equally hard for me to believe this god has not a divine purpose for our existence on earth."
>>Well, yes, I can see that. Once you elect to believe in a supernatural entity for whose existence no real evidence exists it's a trivial embellishment to invest it with an imagined purpose as well.
"And that he would not communicate in many ways what that is."
>>Why then is he not communicating with us, let alone in many ways? One would think that an entity capable of creating life would be capable of effectively communicating the fact of its existence to its creation.
"But you… you are content to think it matters not and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise."
>>I think it matters, but your correct that there isn't any actual evidence which supports the existence of a god or gods--scriptural texts, unexplained events, anecdotal testimony, yes--but evidence? None.
"And also to think that death holds nothing for our rational, incredible lives. No consequences for our words and actions."
>>Clearly there are consewquences for our words and actions--here and now, in the real world. There's no evidence for the continuance of our existance beyond the death of our physical bodies, however, and therefore no reason to presume we'd face consequences for words and actions after our death.