says, without any proof or evidence of any kind, that a political opponenet is, or associates with "terrorists"....

....and you believe her?

Seven of the state employees that were told by this very same woman, not to testify have now agreed to do so.

....and you believe her?

What has this woman ever done to show that she can be believed about anything? We all know she's lied before in regard to Ted Stevens' "Bridge To Nowhere". Wasn't he indicted, and isn't he now standing trial?

It would appear there's a real credibility gap surrounding the Governor of Alaska.

What does one have to do with another?

Ayres admits that he was part of the Weatherman. A domestic terrorist group. Not too many years ago, he had a video taken of him stomping the US flag and saying he was sorry he could not do more as a member of the Weathermen.

The mud is going to be flying more and more as we get close to the election.

It's what most people hate about politics. It's about who the candidate knew, how they got where they are, everything they have ever been accused of doing and many other frivolous topics instead of the issues.

As long as nothing new comes out, Obama is going to win in an electoral landslide. We've heard about the Ayres connection a long time ago. "Troopergate" is going nowhere.

But we will hear about both even more over the next month.

If these people are going to make claims about each others' past, shouldnt they have at least some sort of evidence to back up their claims?

You can talk 'til you're blue in the face about William Ayers, but the fact will remain that the man has been convicted of nothing.

As a GI in the late 60's and ever since - I wasn't and still am not supportive of the SDS or Weather Underground and their activities/tactics, but if Ayers himself did any of the things the neo-tards are accusing him of, don't you think he would have been tried, convicted, and sentenced of something?

Um, don't look now Dr. Tom but there are people running around free who have committed crimes. We know it and they know it. Knowing is one thing, proving it in a court is something different.