Although Tom Tancredo stated that he wasn't being politically correct, by threatening the muslim holy sites instead of the muslim people, he did blunt the sharp point of the message. It shouldn't be the "cities" that are destroyed. The message should simply be, "For every American that dies by the hand of Jihadists, 10,000 of you will die" That might just get their attention. I have no doubt that they would test our resolve to carry out such a threat. After the example is made of the first 10,000 perhaps that would be the time to reopen negotiations. Either we subjugate them or they subjugate us. Based on everything that we've seen so far I can't conceive of any other possible outcome at this point. We don't need nuclear weapons for this. Conventional laser guided ordinance or chemical weapons are more than adequate to make this a "credible" threat. Lest anyone think this is a bigoted or radically extreme position to take, just ask yourself what they would do if they had the capability. But we already know the answer to that, don't we?

AMEN! The radical Islamist "faction" is far from insignificant and its clearly stated goal is nothing short of genocide of the entire citizenry of the United States and Israel. Their supporters, however, extend deep into "mainstream" Islam as proved by worldwide riots in reaction to Western publications that portray their god and his warrior prophet. Witness, too, the failure of Western Muslims to speak out against the brutalities of their radicalized relatives.

It is reasonable to imply that radical Islam and the "peaceful" Muslims who tolerate it would be happier still if all Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, athiests and anyone else who doesn't grovel toward Mecca either submit to them or die, too. (By the way, which Muslim countries have protections for freedom of religion? Isn't evidence of Christian evangelism punishible in most Muslim countries by tortures that Americans denounce in Guantanamo?)

So what if the Crusades failed? It took centruies to develop effective pest control against household vermin like rats and mice. Should we have given up when our cities were ravaged by the Black Death? Of course not.

Muslims must not be allowed to coerce the civilized world into reverse gear -- either by terrorism or by silent complicity with terrorists. There are nice people of every religion -- despite whatever idiotic beliefs their religions push. It's time those nice Muslims get to work cleaning up their own house, and if they don't, we have every reason and right to bulldoze it down. And that house is big black stone in Mecca.

Get real, folks!

The smaller the dick, the more the need to go online and post impotent rants about "we'll kill 10,000 of you for every..." blah blah blah.

Based on everything that we've seen so far I can't conceive of any other possible outcome at this point.

I'm betting there are a whole lot of things that are beyond your comprehension: grade school mathematics, a round earth, marrying someone who isn't a sibling or cousin. But your intellectual limitations aren't much of a basis for foreign policy.

It seems some idiots like terrorism so much, they want to become terroists themselves.

I love how people try to not only use "intellect" when discussing such an intellectually void topic as islamic terrorism, but arrogantly insult others when they simply disagree with their opinion. (Since you can't come up with a actual plan to deal wilth or stop islamic terrorism, you turn to asinine insults regarding this person's math skills?? Well done...like a true liberal.)

You can arrogantly try to act like you and your "intellect" have a supreme, super-secret way to deal with these insects, but in the end, you don't. Maybe, you and the other geniuses of foreign policy like Hillary, John Kerry, etc. can simply talk the terrorists to death!

The terrorists don't want your money, your standard of living, your "understanding of their culture", your "empathizing with their plight" against Israel or the west, or any of your other liberal bilge...they want you, and your family dead yesterday.

Quite frankly, I'm tired of hearing about all of the other great, nice moderate muslims who wouldn't stand up against the terrorists if their life depended on it. If you want to believe that rot, you can. Just wait until it hits home to you.

The idea of a "good" muslim is a mistake. The muslim religion in itself is the reason for the problems we face today and yesterday. It is a religion that breeds violence and radical thinking. The entire muslim culture promotes hate,war,and a negative way of life from birth to death. They have no morales, and do not value human life, not even their own. I'm sure many have seen the videos or pictures of the two year old kids dressed in black,masked, trying very hard to hold up their father's Kalishnikov. If that isn't enough then how about the little girls singing death songs to us with their angelic voices? Muslims children are brainwashed...ahem, I mean, taught to behave the way they do from their parents or elders.

While I don't believe a nuclear attack is necessary, the impending threat might actually work. Muslims cannot get to their heaven without mecca, so the threat of losing that chance for the 70 virgins might work. These people only understand violence, it is the one thing they respect, so if they are so willing to die for allah, maybe they all should. Maybe removing this blight upon the world would make it "a better place to live". Please all would-be muslim sympathizers, feel free to argue "what about the women and chidren?", because your answer will be they are of no consequence. Without the women, their would be no children to grow up to cut off the heads of "our" people.

I get so sick of hearing all these non-spined individuals taking up for a people we are at war with, and yes all the people. Every single muslim, regardless of how "civilized" they may seem, is a potential terrorist. The very act of causing harm to another human being is homage to "their" god. I for one have no sympathy for them, or anyone who is affiliated, concerned,or in any way trying to make them seem like "real" human beings.

XOXOXOX,

PAPA

If you seek to scare Muslims with the idea that they'll be killed before completing a pilgrimage to Mecca, you can forget it. Martyrs go to the head of the line to enter Paradise. Guess what all those people you want to kill would be. (The answer is "martyrs.")

I understand the concept of martyrdom, which is part of their "CULT". Without mecca they cannot reach heaven, their belief system is based on doing certain"acts" to enter paradise. You take the portal to heaven away...no martyrs,no terrorists,no jihad, they would in essence, all go to hell. I say let them. You cannot fight an idea or belief, you have to fight the living beings that hold those ideals and erradicate them. Some would call it genocide, I prefer to call it self preservation. Why should we follow the geneva convention and try to be moral, when they do not? We cannot win by being "soft", we must bring the hammer down and make an example out of them, then the next time before some idiot tries to mess with us they will think "look what happened to them, maybe we shouldn't F**k with the U.S.A.! That is just my stance I believe we should take, but everyone must decide for their self, which is better, to do things the "right" way or to win?