All leaders need to answer hypotheticals
by
Rrhain
08/02/2007, 6:08 PM #
How is it that the only people who can say, "I'm not going to respond to hypotheticals," and be allowed to get away with it are public officials? Does nobody remember their job interviews?
How would you handle this situation?
If you saw this particular scenario, what would be the appropriate response?
Where do you think you'll be in five years?
Presidential candidates have a lot of leeway with this because they're all doing it. If none of them answer the most relevant questions asking them how they would govern under crisis, then voters really don't have any choice.
One would wish the Senate would figure out that they have power: If the candidate refuses to answer hypotheticals, then the candidate is refused appointment. That's the point behind a confirmation hearing, after all: To find out how the candidate would behave in difficult situations.
If they aren't willing to tell us how they would carry out their jobs, detailing the decision-making process, then why on earth do they think we should give them the job? Ah, but to answer would mean you have to take a stand and indicate you have a real position. That makes it difficult to pretend to be all things to all people.