Wrenn:

But no, the Horuses and the Wrenns and all of you taking their sides against Nanotech and me and anyone else who dares to speak in accordance with the intent of "FAITH-BASED" troll this message board constantly for the sole purpose of disruption.

Hey. CD. you'll find that the correct grammer (SIC) is "Nanotech and I"

Brilliant, Wrenn, as usual.

No, really.

Against Nanotech, against ME.

"Grammer." You're a real scholar, you are.

Only a leftist would wax indignant and feign intellectualism while misspelling "grammar" and ignorantly pretending that "against I" is grammatically correct."

Only a leftist.

If it lies like a leftist, and it rails against Christians and conservatives like a leftist, and yet claims NOT to be a leftist,.... you can be sure it's a leftist.

Get a load of this gem, folks:

Only a leftist would wax indignant and feign intellectualism while misspelling "grammar" and ignorantly pretending that "against I" is grammatically correct."

Only a leftist.

"Only leftists" misspell words or use bad grammar? LOL

Look around, dolt, bad spelling and poor grammar is everywhere on these boards, and in fact seems to me more common among righties and conservative types (although that's merely an opinion).

Your silly and dishonest claims that 'only leftists lie' and 'only leftists are atheists' and 'only leftists are poor writers of English' are just that....silly and dishonest.

If it lies, generalizes, abuses, and trolls, it could very well be CaliforniaDreamin, aka spiderMBA. Too bad it can't be permanently gotten rid of.

I got SEVEN I got SEVEN!!!!

My score is way higher than anyone elses!!

<kiss kiss CD>

1) I'd have to take you seriously for any of your words to have any meaning or significance to me.

2) I don't take you seriously. I find you sadly amusing, in a train wreck kind of way.

You have no relevance to me. In any way, shape or form.

Sad.

Bah..you always were the favorite!

:)

Uncle_Spike:

Bah..you always were the favorite!

:)

And I didn't even try!!. When I was trying to increase my score a few months back, I couldn't.

Just goes to show, it pays to be ones lovable self.

You give all us "atheist, Christian-hating, baby-killing and WORSE un-grammatical and bad spelling leftists" something to shoot for, Wrenn.

Keep up the good work!

Reptilicus:

You give all us "atheist, Christian-hating, baby-killing and WORSE un-grammatical and bad spelling leftists" something to shoot for, Wrenn.

Keep up the good work!

Yeppers. I'm just so so amused at how far his aim is off.. I'm not an athiest, I don't hate Christians, I've never killed a baby, (heck, we all misspell here)... but the last is a fair cop.

I AM a south-paw.

JGC:

...is to provide a forum for the discussion of topics relating to faith, nothing more.

Then what in God's name are you doing here?

All you and your Christophobic pals are here for is to DENIGRATE any person of faith, nothing more.

This you and yours do because you have none of your own.

CD,

Aren't YOU guys the ones who kept telling us that "atheism is a religion"??!?!?

And now you bitch that on a religious forum there are atheists!?!?!?!?

haha

Are you saying that it is not possible for someone to be a Christain and either a Democrat, "Leftist", or liberal? I notice that you seem to use these words interchangably.

Wrenn:

1) I'd have to take you seriously for any of your words to have any meaning or significance to me.

2) I don't take you seriously. I find you sadly amusing, in a train wreck kind of way.

You have no relevance to me. In any way, shape or form.

Sad.

1. Your initial and extremely IGNORANT post attempted to mock and ridicule MY grammatical ignorance. In this, you failed quite miserably. You attempted to demonstrate your own intellectual superiority, as Christophobes always do. It is a fool's game you practice, but somehow you and your gaggle of goosey pals never seem to get it.

2. IF you didn't take me seriously, one would never know it from the volume of your responses to my posts, and the volume of people reading my threads - 56 as of this very minute in this morning's listing of you, the Example of the Year. I lost count long ago of how many times you have stuck your athlete's foot inside your enormous and ignorant mouth to earn the EXAMPLE OF THE (DAY, WEEK, MONTH, or YEAR) AWARD.

3. I find you have relevance because you make such a stunningly bad example, for which I have mocked you again and again and again, and yet you continue in your ignorance, for you crave the attention that comes with being made an example of, even if only a very bad one.

Your "grammer against Nanotech and I" is pathetic, ignorant, and typical of Christophobic hubris.

IF you didn't take me seriously, one would never know it from the volume of your responses to my posts, and the volume of people reading my threads

Again. It's been said.

Poor poor widdle CD. geting ALL his personal validation from how many people look at threads he starts...

Your problem CD. Sorry for you.

I, for one, barely skim your topposts. I look to see what other say.

I really think.. you top post attacking people to GET people to look.

Calling out random names in a ' Look at me' 'hey! Look at MEE!!!!!'

Pathetic.

Thought you knew.

As to what I'm doing here, it seems to be equal parts correcting mistatements of fact by religious fundamentalists and suffering fools gladly (well, at least with a sembalnce of a grin.)