Barack Obama does not talk much about his time at Harvard, he tries to hide it since it it became well known it would cost him a lot of votes.

Harvard as we know is a cess pool of ultra-left liberalism and no student seeking a ballanced ducation would do well there. My niece with a 4.3gpa turned Harvard down to get a balanced education. Harvard embodies the liberal creed, is doctrinally left-wing and flagrantly politically correct.

"When Obama was elected as the first black editor of the Law Review, he said in the February 6, 1990 New York Times: "I personally am interested in pushing a strong minority perspective. I'm fairly opinionated about this." Obama's HLS professors included Charles Ogletree, a leading voice advocating taxpayer-funded slavery reparations. Although Obama never publicly supported that position, Ogletree was among Obama's mentors at HLS and now sits on Obama's black advisory council, along with former Harvard professor of Afro-American Studies, Cornel West, according to the National Journal. West also serves as honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America." <link>

With lawyers ranked somewhat lower than used car salesmen in trustworthiness; the Obama has two lawyers as candidates. These two lawyers are ranked #1 and #3 as ultra left-wing Senators. Like used car salesmen they will pick your pockets clean with flagrant lies as their recent ads, such as the very dishonest one about his votes in Illinois Born Alive Infant Abortion Act clearly demonstrate, smiling while they do it.

So what change can we expect from Obama after the pockets of Americans are picked clean by the bailouts - reparations for blacks?

.

Your racism is not only immoral; it's idiotic. You have no evidence that Obama is in favor of reparations. This is just your not very clever way of saying that you wouldn't vote for a black person if your life depended on it. Fine, don't vote for him. But keep your pathetic racism to yourself.

PhDiva:

Your racism is not only immoral; it's idiotic. You have no evidence that Obama is in favor of reparations. This is just your not very clever way of saying that you wouldn't vote for a black person if your life depended on it. Fine, don't vote for him. But keep your pathetic racism to yourself.

Bullsh*t!!! Your screaming racism in response to legitimate issues is contrived bogoted racism in itself and typifies the ignorance associated with electing this entirely unqualified person to president of the USA. His frickin Harvard Law Degree is less than worthless in this day and age; a degree from such a despicable school should disqualify anyone from public office.

Mr. Obama is the one who brings up racism all the frickin time. If holding up a mirror to reflect what he does is offensive, then consider Barack Obama and his cohorts the source!

His people certainly believe he will do something like the following:

"Black Reparation Bonds, or Black Liberation Certificates (BLC's), would work by selling $1 trillion in high yielding bonds today to yield hungry investors around the world. These bonds would be collateralized by a new law passed into existence in the year 2009 when President Obama takes office guaranteeing repayments (tied to reparations) to bond holders over the life of the bond." <link>

Strong advocacy for black reparations is easily on the official Obama/Biden 2008 website!

They officially renamed it - "The Black Political Agenda." <link>

Reparations Means Developing a Black Political Agenda...

By Jabriel Ballentine - May 28th, 2008 at 9:43 pm EDT Also listed in: 4 groups

Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content we know that attaining our reparations means that we must develop a Black Political Agenda. We must have a platform of issues that will serve as a benchmark for judging the politicians that seek our votes. We must have an organization with the ability to unite the various organizations around that platform. This means that the planks of the platform must be succinct enough to promote a particular agenda. However, those planks must be broad enough to encompass the various ideas and objectives of those in the struggle for Black Empowerment.

Reparations means developing a Black Political Agenda. We must have a framework from which to work when we are screening candidates for elective office. We must have a standard to which we hold elected officials accountable. That agenda will serve as our rudder. Without it, the Black Community lacks direction. And, without direction we will continue to drift out to sea...a long way from the shores of safety.

So, how does this demonstrate what reparations means? Developing a Black Political Agenda will enable the community to guard against political apathy. It will provide us with a means by which we can rate those who have been elected to represent our interests; if they do not follow to planks of the platform, they should be removed from office. A Black Political Agenda will help us determine who should be running for office in the first place. With a solid agenda, we will only promote those politicians who are solid on the issues that are pertinent to our community.

Reparations means developing a Black Political Agenda. With such an agenda, we will be able to assert our interests into the debate. We will be able to dictate how politicians and elected officials interact with our Community.

But, to develop such an agenda we need your help. So, please sign into our Google Group. There you will find a post asking for your suggestions for the Black Political Agenda. We know there are many brilliant minds out there. And, we hope to benefit from your feedback. So, please let us know what you think. Log onto our Google Group and let your voice be heard! Let us shape the Black Political Agenda. Come and get your reparations!

Also: <link>

And don't forget. Obama is a closet muslim right?

So when and if he becomes president, after he pays off the negros with our hard earned tax dollars, he's going to sell suitcase bombs to terrorists and have them blow up in every major US city except Chicago and Honolulu.

Also he plans to paint the White House black. Or was that George Clinton?

You seem to think that casting Harvard as a communist hideout you can somehow make people think something that isn't evident in any of Obama's policies or speeches.

The reality is that the last major financial disaster was the S&L crisis, which came from republican efforts to deregulate. Funny that the Bush family was in the middle of that crisis and that Jeb and Neil Bush were both recipients of tax money. Now the bank & financial services companies are even more costly and guess who is involved....Phil Gramm and the usual cast of economic experts. Clinton signed Gramm's bill, but the fact is that it was a republican congress that passed it with a veto proof majority.

Once again we have a republican philosophy that says government is the problem and then they've worked to make that come true.

Does Fred Call have a new name?

Maybe....but if nothing else, Archie is another spammer worthy of being ignored.

Archarito:

Reparations?

When I challenge you to explain how your paranoid Obama scenarios would work...

<link>

...you either ignore me or respond with more wild ranting about implausible intentions.

Really, if you expect to be convincing you should ground your arguments in Planet Earth.

Why didn't your hero George W. Bush decline to attend Harvard. I know its easy to forget, but he does have a Harvard degree. Does that make him for reparations too? A communist?

middleview:

You seem to think that casting Harvard as a communist hideout you can somehow make people think something that isn't evident in any of Obama's policies or speeches.

The reality is that the last major financial disaster was the S&L crisis, which came from republican efforts to deregulate. Funny that the Bush family was in the middle of that crisis and that Jeb and Neil Bush were both recipients of tax money. Now the bank & financial services companies are even more costly and guess who is involved....Phil Gramm and the usual cast of economic experts. Clinton signed Gramm's bill, but the fact is that it was a republican congress that passed it with a veto proof majority.

Once again we have a republican philosophy that says government is the problem and then they've worked to make that come true.

The nonsensical democratic smears are not rooted in honesty, integrity or honorable argument.

Bloomberg realistically, honorably and veracity reports with integrity:

"Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable." <link>

"That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the Democrats was obscene even then. ..... ``It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit. The Democrats and the few Republicans who oppose portfolio limitations could not possibly do so if their constituents understood what they were doing.'"

"If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed."

Democrats have their knickers in a wedgie trying to figure out how to counter the fact that their leaders SOLD OUT our country for a few quick reparation like bucks.

Can't answer me, can you?

Olive & Ouzo & Figgy:

Can't answer me, can you?

I DID. One can lead a horse to water, but; one can't make it drink!

Looks you're trying to obfuscate with nonsense the fact that the Dem reparation attitude is responsible for the financial mess the country is in right now.

No, you didn't. Not at all. Read my post again. Your response has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Olive & Ouzo & Figgy:

No, you didn't. Not at all. Read my post again. Your response has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Yo're mistaken. You bounce around different threads with issues irrelevant to the thread in question. Go back and review the different threads pertinent tothe issues you raise and you will find the answers to the questions pertinent to that thread. When you abusively bounce issues from one thread to another, I appropriately ignore the post as the impudent, abusive spamming post it is. Go get a life!

Olive & Ouzo & Figgy:

No, you didn't. Not at all. Read my post again. Your response has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Your post you refer too does not have one question in it!!!!!

There is no question to answer in your link and your harassing abusive posts are off-topic, illogical, and ignorant!!!!!!!

I respectively expect these obviously abusive, maliciously dishonest posts cease!!!