That is all well and good, but it doesn't address the central premise of the opprobrium she evokes, namely, an appalling lack of knowledge, depth and the arrogance to believe that "conviction" is a substitute for callowness. Even worse, is the pride it fosters in her and her followers. Finally, it has been reiterated in several quarters that simpletons, even well meaning ones cannot solve complex problems.

You mean simpletons who use words when they don't know the meaning?

Thesaurus ≠ Vocabulary

Here's what you just said:

• She isn't arrogant
• She would like to be callow, but uses conviction as a substitute (?!)
• People in their "quarters" (implying seclusion/caution) are in silent agreement that dumb people can't solve hard problems

You know that even imbeciles understand context, and they will understand your every word, no matter how florid, as long as it fits in logically. Your tone, on the other hand, is unsteady and unsure, and your message comes out incorrectly. Note that I haven't even touched on many other grammatical mistakes...

Point noted, thanks.