Slate should write about hysteria in the Fray
by
palmcanoe
09/13/2008, 1:34 PM #
Even while still reading Manjoo's article I knew exactly the tone (and claims) that would be found in the Fray comments. Yet I soldiered ahead anyway and read several. I once read that there are two types of people: 1)those who read letters to the editor/comments and 2)those who don't. I guess I'm the former.
Am I alone in thinking that the tone of commentary has become insane? I guess Manjoo points it out when he mentions the fragmentation of the media effect on public opinion. I often find myself running into references to some "fact" in the comments online that then spills out to something more mainstream like an off-hand interview comment on a news program or overhead conversations out at restaurants or in lines. I wish I had a dollar for every time I've heard the Obama/Osama idiocy (both through media and in casual interaction).
The most telling statement in the entire article was the quote from political strategist John Feehery: "As long as those are out there, these little facts don't really matter."
This distresses me quite a bit. Doesn't it distress anyone else?