enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
From the perspective of someone organizing
by xtymcg

I'm disappointed in Slate for not soliciting more thoughtful comments on on the Palin jabs. This drivel was so obviously written by someone who has never worked as an organizer.

Here's to jumping into the Fray, and some of my own thoughts post RNC:

There have been a lot of themes thrown around during the Republican convention. Two have caught my attention: the constant references to the physical violence inflicted upon John McCain while serving in Vietnam, and the numerous disparaging comments made tonight about Barack Obama's work as a community organizer in Chicago.



Interestingly, the Republicans were also ready to invoke two of the major U.S. social justice movements (the Civil Rights movement, and the Women's movement), in an effort to buttress their standard shrink-the-government populist talking points—anything to whip up the crowd into paroxysms of frenzied fervor. So, this is what I gleaned from the speeches tonight: The sky is the limit! All you need to do is work hard and you'll be rewarded with public accolades and the fruits of a trickle down economy! "They," might have nominated a black candidate, we got a woman! We are color blind and we don't care about gender, we promise! We're saying it in front of lots of TV cameras, hot cha cha!



Setting aside all the problems with frantic assertions that all of our problems have been fixed and we no longer need to fight racism and sexism, I was shocked and disgusted by the glib and off-hand way in which the Republicans took credit for the work that community organizers have done, while literally snickering and sneering at the profession itself. What a slap in the face.



Back to those first two themes: John McCain got the crap beat out of him in a P.O.W. camp, and community organizers don't really do anything. I think the real problem is that Republicans either a) don't understand community organizing, or b) they understand it quite well and are actively working to disseminate an inaccurate picture of what it entails in an effort to undermine social change.



Lets start with a): I would like to take this opportunity to briefly explain community organizing for anyone who hasn't had the privilege of working as one:



Community organizers do something much scarier than attacking their enemies with guns and bombs. They work to undermine unjust power structures in creative, compelling, and lasting ways. Community organizers work to give other people agency over their lives, and they work to redistribute power in an equitable way. Rosa Parks was a trained organizer. Martin Luther King Jr, was heir to a long line of organizers that built the movement that he stepped in to lead.



Power is never conceded. It is taken. What happens when you organize to take power and give it to other people? People in power retaliate—often with violence. Lynching is a fate that met many community organizers in the Civil Rights movement.



Mike Huckabee sanctimoniously reminded people of the horrible inequities, and violence, faced by people of color in days of yore. He was also quick to celebrate the fact that we no longer have to pay attention to color. Well, Mike, the reason we are even having this conversation in a national context is because people of color and their allies have been fighting, and dying, for four hundred years to get here. Ignoring "it" is completely disrespectful, and quite frankly another tool to prop up existing power structures, so please stop acting like ignorant "colorblind" bliss is a goal to aspire to.



Granted, far from of being heroes in a state sponsored war, most community organizers working in the Civil Rights movement were fighting against state sponsored violence. That probably has something to do with the way that their work is characterized by Republicans.



It would take far too long to go through examples of all the state sponsored violence faced by community organizers, but I think it's helpful just to remember a few poignant examples. Alice Paul didn't spend time in the Hanoi Hilton, but she was jailed in the United States of America for organizing as a suffragette. She was beaten and force fed for having the audacity to say that women are human beings and deserve to participate in the political system. I wonder what she would think of Palin, accepting the nomination of Vice President, while simultaneously making disparaging comments about the women who fought before her for that right. The sheer audacity makes my jaw drop. Labor organizers are physically threatened on a daily basis—in fact there were several recent notorious murders of labor organizers in South America working to unionize Coke bottling plants.



So, Mr. Giuliani and Sarah Palin and anyone else who might be confused about what community organizing entails:



Yes, community organizing means fighting for something bigger than yourself--without the U.S. military backing you up. It means giving hundreds of other people the training, the skills, and the confidence to do the exact same job that you are doing, and hopefully when you're done they do your job better than you do. It means walking into rooms and situations where you know you are not welcome, and making yourself even more unwelcome. It means fundraising your own paycheck. It means going to work and sometimes not getting a paycheck, and just doing the work because you care that much. It means making enemies. It means making enough friends to take your enemies on. It can mean physical violence, and it often has. It means discovering all the stories that you weren't taught in your high school history class. It means being a part of everything good about America. It means giving credit to other people, and working to make sure that everyone is recognized for the contributions that they have made to the collective effort. It means putting other people in the spot light. It means being a part of the underground rail road, the wildcat strikes of the 1930s, the burgeoning community gardening projects providing food to City of Detroit, the communities fighting to maintain access to clean, safe drinking water, the Rape Awareness Project, the March on Washington that ended in the "I Have a Dream," speech, and the list goes on. And on. And on. Because the work will never be done.



This brings me to b):



Republicans, at least some of them, probably do understand what community organizing entails, which is why they are so quick to denigrate it. I am reminded of that famous quote from Ghandi, "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."



So I suppose that I shouldn't be too rankled that Republican strategists saw the need to laugh at Obama's work as a community organizer. That puts us at an interesting point in that continuum of retaliation.

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by Samujo
I don't think you heard the speech -- red necks morons who fetishize ignorance don't like what you do. I thank you for your service!
Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by conservativebynature

xtymcg,

Are you writing a thesis here?

We don't really care how many ways you can justify the importance of a community organizer here. And, by reading your (yawn) seemingly incessant rationalization regarding this topic, you must have a similar job yourself.

You simply just don't get it!

What we do care about is how a "community organizer" automatically makes you qualified for the Presidency when a governor doesn't qualify you to be a Vice President(the original accusation from the Dems).

Samujo
by conservativebynature
Judging by your input, it would appear that you have something in common with "moronic rednecks"---- the content and quality of your responses, which have as much rhetoric as the party you support.
Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by xtymcg

" We don't really care how many ways you can justify the importance of a community organizer here."

The work justifies itself, regardless of whether or not you care about it. The RNC did its best to take credit for the work of community organizers, while making fun of the position, which is absurd. Hence, why I pointed that hypocrisy out and clarified what community organizers actually do. And yes, I do work as one--as the title of the post suggest. I'm proud of it.

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by codex77

CBN: Of course and obviously, no one said that being a community organizer automatically qualifies a person to be President.

Obama was an organizer when he was in his mid-20's, 20+ years ago. He's done a lot since.

Yet Palin chose to snidely ridicule the important work he did as a young man, when he could have chosen among many much more lucrative jobs.

What was Palin doing at the same point in her life? Oh yeah, she was gaining valuable leadership experience and serving her community by reading TV sports reports about the Iditarod.

Good post, xtymcg.

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by pawntucket
Thank you, xtymcg. Well said. And thanks for your work.
Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by conservativebynature

Again, you guys simply don't get it! (codex77 & xtymcg)

The logic of liberalism:

You guys question Palin's experience first (Mayor of small town/Governor of small state)

She simply states the obvious true statement--- your Presidential candidate has no more experience than she does, or less (community organizer)

You guys then take her simply stated fact (defending herself) as a malicious shot toward anyone and everyone serving in the "communities around the world".

Typical whining liberalism!

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by conservativebynature

Oh, yeah! I forgot... then you all patronize each other by telling each other how "right-on" you are.

We'll see who's still standing after November, won't we!

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by xtymcg

Conservativebynature,

I understand the need of the RNC to sell Palin as qualified. That's not what my post was about. I was addressing those two themes at the RNC, which I stated from the very beginning.

Rest assured that come November I will be looking back on all the work that I did organizing--knocking on doors, running GOTV efforts, talking to voters face to face about issues we all care about, recruiting other volunteers to do the same, organizing precinct captains--all with an eye to turning as many voters out to the polls as possible. There will be no whining involved. Just hard work.

Experience
by Neuro

If someone's a governor, no matter who it is, their experience with global concerns will get questioned. If someone's a senator, no matter who it is, their lack of executive experience will be highlighted. Experience is always a question, no matter who the candidate is.

With respect to Obama, he has been addressing questions of his lack of experience as best he can for more than a year. He has defended himself by saying his life has been devoted to civil service, that his upbringing helps him understand people of many different classes, that he's worked at several levels of government, and that he has international experiences valuable to a president. Whether that is enough, well, I don't think anyone is ever ready to be president, but it's an honest attempt to show that he's prepared.

With respect to Palin, she only just burst onto the national stage and there is precious little time to show that she's ready. So far, to me, she has not shown that she is. She took her big moment at the RN convention and, instead of defending herself, attacked Obama. I don't care that she didn't write the speech or that it's traditional for the VP candidate to be the attack dog. I just wish she could defend herself without mocking someone else's experience. That she did not do that, well, I was very disappointed.

Re: From the perspective of someone organizing
by pawntucket
"She simply states the obvious true statement--- your Presidential candidate has no more experience than she does, or less (community organizer)"

Wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

What she said was, "I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a community organizer, except that you have actual responsibilities."

Now, so the point isn't lost on you, I'll revert to the inelegant but easily digestible analogous sentence:

"Being a community organizer is sort of like being a POW, except that you have actual responsibilities." --Barack Obama

WHOA! He. Did. Not. Just. Go. There. That is an affront to every POW--everywhere. What lack of taste, what nerve, what despicable character, what--oh, what's that you say? You didn't mean ALL POW's? Just John McCain?

Huh. Funny how it reads when you switch the roles around a little bit. But I guess insulting a profession that includes Martin Luther King, Jr. is OK when you're defending yourself against--well, not against the person you're actually insulting, but against bloggers and posters and hacks, oh my!

Let's try some others:
"No, not all mothers of pregnant teens! Just Sarah Palin!"
"I didn't mean ALL black people--just Barack Obama! Sheesh!"
"What? All widowers? No, you idiot, I was just defending myself again Joe Biden!"
"Huh? You seriously thought I meant ALL victims of torture? What a jerk! I just meant John McCain!"
Re: Samujo
by Samujo

conservativebynature:
Judging by your input, it would appear that you have something in common with "moronic rednecks"---- the content and quality of your responses, which have as much rhetoric as the party you support.

Do you know you don't know what rhetoric means? Are you educated? Or sorry, being uneducated is a virtue. My mistake.

View as RSS news feed in XML