THis fucking cunt says the following

"By vaunting their pro-life agenda over everything else, conservatives are abandoning one of their most valuable insights: that intact, two-parent families are best for children and for the foundation of a healthy society. The evidence here is overwhelming. Children with two parents, whether of the same sex or the opposite sex, are vastly better off."

Ok motherfucker, so guess what, did this ever occur to you, you fucking malignant force of evil, there might be challenges and struggles and the 'ideal' family might not occur, but guess what else doesn't occur? MURDER. No one dies. No one has to die. Isn't that nice. A blood soaked murderous 'nice wealthy family with stability' or a hands clean 'poor family'.

Wow, and to equate 'healthy society' with fags raising kids... that my fucking idiot friend, is appalling.

If a lesbian woman were to become pregnant (not an uncommon event), and chose to rear her child with a female partner, I take it that as you're such a supporter of the sanctity of the family, you'd applaud her decision not to abort the baby, and instead to provide it with a loving home??

Because otherwise you expose yourself as not just a fucking hypocrite, but a bigoted hypocrite at that.

Nowhere near as appalling as the hateful, frightening tone of this ugly message that is purportedly in support of life but instead reeks of death.

Flawed logic since the alternative of adoption by a heterosexual couple exists.

There seems to be a distinct positive correlation between public use of vulgar language and careless reasoning with unsupported assertions. I hope it is no libel to those of a liberal-progressive bent to note that the free public use of words once regarded as indecent is found far more commonly among their kind than among people called conservative. Exceptions, as always, prove the rule.

One wonders what people think the choice of terms formerly off-limits in public adds to their posts - besides distinguishing them for bad manners and poor taste. Does it seem to such people that their arguments are strengthened by such language? Do they imagine that they will gain respect and credibility by the casual use of obscenities? Or are they simply so overwrought that they are unable to control themselves?

Perhaps it is a mode of resistance and rebellion, a means of signifiying oneself as independent and liberated from oppressive social norms? Possibly it might be the natural consequence of prolonged or arrested adolescence?

Whatever may be the explanation, talking dirty does not necessarily enhance credibility nor fortify the truth claims of whatever one happens to be going on about at the moment. The result is much more likely to be the opposite of what the writer wishes, since it is difficult to take seriously people who behave this way in public and among people they do not know. One is bound to assume a degree of immaturity that renders their opinions and ideas subject to a readier dismissal than is perhaps always warranted.

Bad manners, bad thinking, and bad behavior tend to go together.

The worst thing you can call anyone is a cunt vaarrgz. What does that say about our woman hating societies? Then there is that charming expression 'motherfucker' - more hate and contempt for women and mothers. You call the person you don't agree with a 'fucking cunt' which is a tautology: what else would a cunt do but fuck? Then you try to pretend that you care about women, children and families. Your hate-filled language gives you away. All you care about is the sound of your own voice and it's intolerable to you that anyone believes what you don't believe- an indication of very low self-esteem and lack of confidence. Hating people because you don't agree with them is what the Nazis did. That didn't end too well, as I recall. The ultra right are a bunch of misfits who label others who have different beliefs as 'fags' and 'cunts' because they're afraid of plurality: it threatens their fragile egos. The only thing they really love is war, the ultimate expression of hate and conformity- and if they can drag God into it they always do.

A man (or a woman) tries for civil discourse and this is the response he (or she) gets? Didn't anyone actually look at the opening post? It's in calm, arial narrow normal. No bolding. No all caps. Don't you think if he was a raving lunatic, there would be some indication by intensifying type as is the manner?

Mothers talk like this all the time and they say they are very calm, very calm indeed, in spite of the fact that they have to deal with morons that just don't understand that they are completely fucking moronic for not agreeing with them.

Nice environment you are creating.

How is that only abortion is murder. What if the kid is raised by neglecful parents and they beat her to death, or she becomes a drug addict later on, or the mother doesn't have the healthcare resources to take care of the baby properly and she dies as an infant?

I find it so funny, so very, very funny that the anti-abortionist right-wing fringe ONLY cares about a child while in-utero, but after they come out of the vagina, they are on their own. If the kid is poor--fuck you you're own your own; if the kid doesn't have healthcare--take it up the ass motherfucker, you're on your own.

This is the philosophy that those right-winger assfucks espouse.

Maybe scientists should invent some kind of artificial uterus that underprivielged kids can wear so these right wing fucktards will give a shit after a child is born.

That artificial uterus would look like a big condom. I like the idea, might be a necessary reminder for those who should never forget to use one.