enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 2 (22 items)   1 2 Next >
FAQ Gives Proof That Palin Is Liar Or An Idiot!
by criticalthinkerr

She is one or the other take your pick!

IF Sara was pregnant and after feeling contractions a month premature while carrying a Down's syndrome baby, then she is an IDIOT because:

1. She does not stop her speech and IMMEDIATELY go to a Houston hospital with a neonatal unit to get checked out.

2. She gets on a plane knowing full well that she might give birth on the flight which could force the plane to divert without telling the airline.

3. She does not get off the plane in the Seattle stop over and IMMEDIATELY go to a hospital with a neonatal unit.

4. She gets on another plane knowing full well that she might give birth on the flight which could force the plane to divert without telling the airline.

5. She does not IMMEDIATELY go to a hospital with a neonatal unit in Anchorage when the plane lands.

6. She drives 45 minutes to her local doctor instead of IMMEDIATELY going to her local hospital.

7. She then gives a premature birth at the doctor's office and the baby is then taken to the local hospital.

8. She then returns to work 3 day's later!

IF her daughter Bristol was really the one pregnant then Sara is a LIAR beacuse:

1. Her daughter was not out of school over six months with mono, which is easily cured with antibiotics in less than a month.

2. Her daughter called when Sara was in Houston, and said that she was about to give or had given birth prematurely and her mother better get back to Alaska to commit the FRAUD.

3. Sara could not let any doctor other than her own local doctor see her or the FRAUD would have be exposed hence the not going to the Houston, Seattle, Anchorage or he local hospital.

4. Bristol had to deliver the baby at the local doctor's office and not the hospital or the FRAUD would have been exposed,

5. After the baby was born Sara took it to the local hospital and claimed Trig as her own, which is why she never looked pregnant before the FAKE seven month pregnant announcement, and why she sould return to work just 3 days later, and why her daughter is the one on TV seen holding the baby Trig.

It Is Possible That She Is Both.
by LeRoy_Was_Here
One can be an idiot, or one can be a liar, but it is also possible that one can be an idiotic liar or a lying idiot.
Re: It Is Possible That She Is Both.
by criticalthinkerr

My bad, you are correct LeRoy_Was_Here she could be both.

But either makes her unfit for the office she is running for!

Bristal wasn't the mother. There are real issues w Palin
by gone_fishing
But the real issues have to do with corrupt John McCain: <link>
Re: Bristal wasn't the mother. There are real issues w Palin
by criticalthinkerr

re: gone_fishing

Why do you say Bristal was not the mother?

If Sara and Bristol would LIE about Trig's birth, why wouldn't they LIE abot Bristal being 5 months pregant now?

I am willing to bet the farm that Bristal has a "miscarriage" before April 18th 2008 plus nine months or delivers a baby after April 18th 2008 plus nine months!

Nobody has mono for over six months, and nobody leaking amniotic fluid or having contractions with carrying a premature Down's syndrome baby will bypass 4 hospitals to go have the baby delivered at a local doctors office, and then return to work 3 days later, because if anybody believes that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you!

Not trying to be a dick
by spruce

It's Sarah with an "h." It is Bristol with an "o" (you got it right several times, wrong on others (in another post)).

I have typos in my posts all the time. I misspell words all the time, as well. I am not trying to be a grammarian or overly harsh because usually such minor points are trivial in an informal formum like the Fray. I do find this, though, to be an interesting topic worthy of discussion. You have to spell her name right otherwise people might dismiss you out of hand.

Re: Bristal wasn't the mother. There are real issues w Palin
by middleview

McCain's love affair with lobbyists and their clients is no secret. His claim of having a greater value system and that he'd bring integrity back to the RNC is laughable.

His vacations with Keating, his wife's investments with Keating, his relationship with Paxson and interference on their behalf with the FCC means that he can be bought. He points a finger at earmarks and implies that all earmarks are an example of pork, which is incorrect and could even be considered slander. Hillary Clinton put earmarks in the budget to upgrade military housing at Fort Drum. Would McCain like to explain how that is pork barrel spending?

By the way, didn't you just love Cindy McCain's $300k outfit the other night? Her dress was a bargain at $20,000. I'm so glad they are in touch with the common man.

You people are crazy
by tonydavisnelson

Is that the best you can do? A fucking conspiracy to cover up a pregnancy?!?!?!?!?

Do you need to be reminded that Sarah was almost 100 times more likely to give birth to a Down's kid than her daughter?!?!?!?!

You people are idiots.

Who cares
by mithros

Leave Bristol out of it. Even if the story is true, it is irrelevant to the campaign or the country.

What is relevant is judging Palin on matters of integrety. After all, she's:

1). A supporter of the Alaskan Independence Party as of 2008.

2). Repeatedly made claims to have said thanks but no thanks, even though she still took all $230 Million in federal pork.

3). Willing to humiliate her daughter to squash a silly rumor.

4). Cut children with special needs funding by 60%.

5). Thinks that we can drill our way to energy independence, even though we have 3% of the worlds reserves but use 25% of the worlds oil.

Re: You people are crazy
by criticalthinkerr

re: tonydavisnelson

Do you not know that the MAJORITY of Down's syndrome children are born to woman under 30 and that GENETICS is the overwhelming reason for the chromsonal abnormality?

But of course, you never bothered to Google before you posted and check the accuracy of your statement, now did you?

No an IDIOT is a person who believes that a teenager would miss over six months of school with mono which can be cured with antibiotics in a few weeks.

No an IDIOT is a person who believes that a monther who cares for her unborn child KNOWING that it has Down's Syndrome and is MORE LIKELY to be born with health problems than a normal child, would not go to any of 3 big city hospitals with neonatal units or even the local hospital, but would instead have a PREMATURE child with Down's Syndrome delivered at the local docto's office.

No an IDIOT is a person whom would believe that a mother who just went thru that PREMATURE birth of child with Down's Syndrome, would go back to work in 3 days when a child that is "supposedly" a month premature would still be in the hospital!

Some of us are SMART enough to figure out who the murdered is in Columbo without watching the first part of the show, and we can catch logical inconsistancies and weave then into the narrative of what actually happend as LOGIC would dictate.

Even with the snowball's chance in hell that I am wrong, it only means that Sarah Palin is a IDIOT and world's most RECKLESS mother of an unborn child ever, and an UNCARING bitch to go back to work while your "premature" child is still in the hospital!

But people who lack "critical thinking" skills would never think to ask why a "supposedly month premature" Downs Syndrome child would not be in the hospital 3 days after being born, now would they?

Re: Who cares
by criticalthinkerr

re: mithros

I care and so should you, because declaring a child that is not yours on your income tax is a CRIME, and cheats the government out of revenue!

Not to mention the taxpayers of Alaska who are paying for Trig's heath insurance under Sarah's coverage!

I would really like to see if Sarah declares Trig on any future tax returns or used her medical insurance for his bills.

Re: You people are crazy
by KevDurden

You openly admit that Sarah Palin willingly got pregnant when she knew the child was 100 times more likely to have Down's? And you call them not Sarah, the idiots? Wanna go over that thought process again?

tonydavisnelson:

Is that the best you can do? A fucking conspiracy to cover up a pregnancy?!?!?!?!?

Do you need to be reminded that Sarah was almost 100 times more likely to give birth to a Down's kid than her daughter?!?!?!?!

You people are idiots.

Re: Who cares
by KevDurden
mithros:

Leave Bristol out of it. Even if the story is true, it is irrelevant to the campaign or the country.

What is relevant is judging Palin on matters of integrety. After all, she's:

1). A supporter of the Alaskan Independence Party as of 2008.

2). Repeatedly made claims to have said thanks but no thanks, even though she still took all $230 Million in federal pork.

3). Willing to humiliate her daughter to squash a silly rumor.

4). Cut children with special needs funding by 60%.

5). Thinks that we can drill our way to energy independence, even though we have 3% of the worlds reserves but use 25% of the worlds oil.

While I agree that the issues are what's important, I have to disagree that her family is off limits. Any politician who uses their family as credentials or onstage props just cut the claim to their privacy. This goes for anybody. How many times did Palin reference herself as a "hockey mom," and talk about her kids and performance as a mom, versus any policy discussion?

She made this about her family. Nobody else.

Re: Who cares
by thewolf05827
Quite a little life you've carved out for yourself, there.
Re: You people are crazy
by Bondsman
criticalthinkerr:

re: tonydavisnelson

Do you not know that the MAJORITY of Down's syndrome children are born to woman under 30 and that GENETICS is the overwhelming reason for the chromsonal abnormality?

Let me correct something here. The majority of BABIES are born to women under 30, so that's when most genetically abnormal babies are born, but that is NOT the same thing as saying young women have a higher or the same risk of having a Down's syndrome baby as an older woman.

On the contrary, there is absolutely NO question in medical science that the older the woman is when conceiving a baby, the higher the risk is for having a Down's syndrome child. From the AAFP website: <link>

"Prenatal Risk Assessment

Advanced Maternal Age
The incidence of fetal trisomies is directly related to maternal age.7 The risk of having a child with Down syndrome increases in a gradual, linear fashion until about age 30 and increases exponentially thereafter (Figure 1).8 The risk of having a child with Down syndrome is 1/1,300 for a 25-year-old woman; at age 35, the risk increases to 1/365. At age 45, the risk of a having a child with Down syndrome increases to 1/30. (By convention, maternal age refers to age at the estimated or actual delivery date.)"

So you see, the baby is much more likely to be Sarah Palin's, because Sarah is, well, *old* for a new mother.

Page 1 of 2 (22 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML