Again, Palin has more executive experience than John McCain too. It is a silly game you are playing and you know it.
As stated earlier, Palin recently admitted she didn't even know what the Vice President does. She also said she had thought much about Iraq. Is this the "executive experience" you want?
It takes more than being in an elective position to be a leader. Obama has served in numerous leadership roles for more than 20 years, some elected positions, some not. He has served on numerous executive boards; he has served as a state senator; he has served as a U.S. Senator. In each of those roles, his accomplishments are a matter of public record.
For instance, one of his first appointments in the U.S. Senate was to the Foreign Relations Committee. Within four months of the appointment, he took a trip with Republican Dick Lugar to Russia, the Ukraine, and Azerbijan to work on issues of nuclear non-proliferation.
When he returned, he and Lugar co-sponsored a bill, since past into law, on non-proliferation.
In his role as Senator and as a presidential candidate, he has travelled abroad on a number of occassions; has met with numerous foreign dignitaries; and most importantly shown a capactiy to lead.
So, Ms. Palin's 1.5 years of Governor of a state with about 600,000 people really doesn't impress me anymore than the mayor of my city, Oklahoma City, does.
It takes more than just experience, though. Had Palin demonstrated out of the gate that she was ready to be Vice President, I wouldn't question he very thin resume. Admittedly, Obama has a thin resume in these regard. Instead, one of the first things out of her mouth was that she needed someone to tell her just what it was the Vice President did. How anyone can defend that is beyond my capacity of reason.