However -- I want to address your point. This is something I have posted elsewhere:
"
I will grant you that, unlike so many religious fundamentalists,
Palin is not a hypocrite. I can respect her for that, personally -- but
her values and principles are still wrong, and I must oppose her
politically based on her being wrong.
She is consistent in her wrongheaded beliefs -- which means that she is consistently wrong
A
hypocritical pro-lifer should be criticized and opposed both
politically (for being wrong) and personally (for being a hypocrite); a
person like Palin should just be opposed politically. (Just as a
hypocrite like Bill Clinton or John Edwards should be opposed
personally, but not necessarily politically.)"
However, this story raises a question about Sarah Palin. Which child is she making choices regarding -- her eighteen year old daughter or the infant Trig? Which one is her child? Inquiring minds want to know.
I think John Edwards should take a paternity test - but now I want him to make it conditional on Sarah Palin taking a maternity test.
Beathan