Which is more important to you when picking a candidate to support...change or experience?

neither. I choose leadership, because without it there is no change, experience is secondary.

which is a lie but go ahead and run with that.

I look for leadership, ideas and general ability.

Experience can be more than meaningless. I have met far too many "experienced" people that have made incorrect decisions and assumptions for that alone to be a consideration.

Same with change. It's a nebulous word that means absolutely nothing by itself.

Judgement. Which McCain has displayed he lacks. And in the case of the Bush era........Damn! CHANGE

here is another very good lie. you guys got your talking points quick!

so you go for change, glad to see you stopping all this talk about Palin's lack of experience.

I have the quote from Albert Einstein on Insanity.

Applied to this situation...Insanity is electing candidates from the same party over and over again, and expecting a different result.

I prefer change, since change is unavoidable, and the wrong experience in the face of change often leads to failure.

You're a useless wart on the asshole of humanity.

Feel free to once again...as you are such a serious, issues oriented poster, the best on the board, I've heard some say, comment on the post, instead of...(oh my god....I"M CHEESE!!!)...the poster.!!!

is away from modern republicanism.

Other than being a woman, what "change" does Palin bring?

How can that be a lie?

You left out educational background,intelligence,judgme­nt,goals,policy stances,innovation/creativity,­temperament etc. etc.

I tend to look at more of the complete package and yeah,sometimes I hold my nose when I punch the button in the voting booth.