enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Slow Food Movement
by Joe_JP
"Slow Food Movement--which combines concern over food production processes with gourmet tastes"

The Slow Food Movement is an intriguing effort with both cultural and environmental/health related aspects. Its own website summarizes things thusly:

Slow Food is a non-profit, eco-gastronomic member-supported organization that was founded in 1989 to counteract fast food and fast life, the disappearance of local food traditions and people’s dwindling interest in the food they eat, where it comes from, how it tastes and how our food choices affect the rest of the world.

"Gourmet tastes" has something of an elite flavor, but at its heart, the movement wants to encourage the special place of food in culture. To mention just one aspect, the value of local farmer's markets (I myself partook recently, including enjoying some apple/rhubarb cider [actually tasty] and eggplant [add some water, microwave for a few minutes, and eggplant chunks are cooked quite nicely*]), and enjoying cooking/eating with friends and family.

[Will Saletan critized a move to block the building of more "fast food" (an open ended term) restaurants in certain areas and I too wondered just how workable the move really was. But, healthy eating, especially for certain groups, is very important. Thus, the availability of EBT at local farmer markets and so forth are important initiatives.]

Where food comes from is important, as local farmer markets suggest. The involvement of Michael Pollan (author of such things as Botany of Desire) raises issues of biodiversity. So, it is not just a matter of taking some care of what to eat, but to eat smartly and supporting public policies that further healty agriculture. Thus, a recent farm bill, not of much note in the media, was of some importance.

Pollan btw in his latest book discussed the overproduction of corn (including corn syrup), see also a goofy looking doc available in Blockbuster, King Corn. The author of Fast Food Nation also is involved, his follow-up also in part concerns food production (the underground economy: marijuana, migrant labor/strawberry production, and pornography).

As the Oxford Companion to Food summarizes:

The quality of the food and drink on our tables is seen as closely linked to the work of farmers and producers, to the environment, and to the preservation of biodiversity. Its mission, therefore, complements the many initiative by individuals and other groups to promote better food and the preservation of technologies and communities involved in its production.

---

* This underlines that there are some small things you can do without being a chef or having a home garden, though lots of people do a little of both, and will suggest it isn't too hard really. But, even good cooks will tell you that sometimes the microwave can be quite useful.

I'm not buying it
by Unamuno
Have you heard of UN Agenda 21? Have you heard of Codex? This whole sustainable earth argument is ultimately as devious as monsanto. Please Google and better YouTube UN Agenda 21 and Codex, nutricide.
Re: I'm not buying it
by Joe_JP

If one takes as a given such regulatory schemes are dangerous, for the sake of argument, I still am unclear how it erases the various important issues involved in the slow food movement. Dispute over means doesn't erase its ends.

Nor does concern with a more personal connection with food, respect for local farmers, diversity of diet and so forth somehow go hand in hand with the things you list. In fact, some ("nutricide") directly appear to go counter to slow food friendly ends. Food diversity and alternative foods and herbs is the path of SF friendly health food stores and so forth.

-j

View as RSS news feed in XML