enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
I understand we'll be hearing some
by JesseD
Bomb bomb bomb Iraq war mentality ads. We need to awaken America to the idea that diplomacy works much better and less expensive than war mentality.
LOL...yea..."Talk" works SOMETIMES....
by ZealotforTruth
But, ummm, not so much, when talking to men like Hitler, Stalin, or Hussein. Probably not so much with Mahmoud or Putin, although Mahmoud needs to watch is own backside, as the Clerics in Iran are starting to get miffed with him.....Perhaps, Mahmoud has "Talked" too much.
Re: LOL...yea..."Talk" works SOMETIMES....
by JesseD
Hitler and Stalin gone long ago (Good and Just war, hot and cold). Hussein was none of our business and neither are Mahmound or Putin. Concentrate on improving your block, not the world.
chebby say's Hussein none of our business
by dadawg

these democrats/liberals evidently didn't get chebby's message:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that .. Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for . . . it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks . . . " - Bill Clinton on Larry King Live, ~July 30, 2003


Are you Neville Chamberlain's Granddaughter?
by ZealotforTruth

Because you sound a whole lot like him.

Me? I prefer to stand with "warmongers" like Churchill and Rosevelt.....

Re: chebby say's Hussein none of our business
by LT-7

None of them started the war. Bush did.

Beyond that, they were wrong. Some of us, me for example, knew this war was wrong before it started.

I was correct, Doggone. You are wrong.

Re: Are you Neville Chamberlain's Granddaughter?
by LT-7
Roosevelt and Churchill dealt with Hitler. It was an entirely different situation. They would not have waged war in Iraq. Neither of them was that stupid. Especially if we are attacked by a terrorist organization and need to deal with that threat. Attacking Iraq was the last thing we needed to do.
If you say so.....
by ZealotforTruth

But BOTH men tried and tried and tried to ge the Western Nations to unite and stand against Hitler.

They were called "warmongers" for it....

Of coruse, I am resigned to the fact that Western Nations can and will be cowed into non-action until their backs are completely up against the wall.

Hopefully, it won't take more than two nukes or terror attacks on American Soil to convince an Obama Administration that terrorists can't be 'talked to....'

I mean, after all, "Talk" sure has slowed the Iranian Nuclear program down, right?

Re: Are you Neville Chamberlain's Granddaughter?
by HennaRinse

Iraq and Saddam were not Hitler and Germany. Why do Republicans persist in drawing that correlation? Neither is Ahmadinejad and Iran.

As for Putin and Russia, is your contention we should be drawn into a shooting war with Russia? Or are you proposing we engage in a new cold war? We negotiated with the Russians all through that era, so why not this time? There is a good reason we did, do you remember the promise of mutually assured destruction?

View as RSS news feed in XML