Maybe these women are just sick of being taken for granted by the male powers that be?

Maybe reacting to Hillary's loss by voting for a candidate who holds mostly opposite positions from her own is kinda dumb?

I saw a tricked out Hillary car in my neighborhood (flags, bumper stickers -- it was a Prius) with a sticker on the back that said:

Racism is the new Sexism

Suffice it to say, I wanted to key the thing.

nothing dumb about it. we watched the media and the DNC destroy and disrrespect our very qualified candidate.

take a stand ladies. vote in your very big interest for a change.!

latte liberals vote against their economic interests all the time. Rich New Yorkers going blue when Red will keep thier taxes lower. so don't hold that crap over my head EVER Again!. Rov v. Wade was whacked in 2007 and liberals didn't say a word.

WE need to vote McCain this year and the JOY of JOY get a female in the WH in 2012

this is very much in our interest. seeing a woman in the top slot will end the rants of sexist Dahlia's who pander to male power. when women get some power they won't be subjected to luny tuny rants of DH or D. travers. go hold R. v. Wade over you own head! I'm looking for the LONG TERM benefit!

I'm calling troll on "joe reader". We don't need more McCain plants telling us how to vote.

I did not see the media disrespect Hillary. I am a woman who thought they spent too much time building her up as queen of all America for almost a year and felt nauseated through it all.

As a woman i am glad she lost and wish her lunatic fringies would crawl back under the rock they slithered out of.

"Pander to male power." Can't it be having a different opinion? I'm a big Obama supporter and not a fan of Hillary's (although ya'll are making me feel sorry for her because her supporters are embarassing her).

The Hillary Harridans make me nuts. Even publically nuts. And angry. And annoyed. But, I've never blamed men for your opinions.

The Hillary Harridans sort of pander to the idea that all women have to think the same, vote the same, be the same. Maybe some man hurt you in the past. We can share stories; I have some that will probably beat yours. This author can think differently than you just as you can think differently from me. I'm not going to see you as pandering to anyone just because you have a different point of view. Ya'll are annoying the hell out of me about now and I think are damaging women's chances to be a part of the process. I hate, hate, hate to lose and would be a big baby about now if my candidate had lost. Really. I'd be a mess. He's inspired me and lifted me up. And, yeah, my candidate is one who pushed that emotional button for me.

Why can't you see that it's not anti-feminism to be inspired by a man? Why attack a woman for stating her point of view? And, if all women have to share your point of view, we might as well go back to being good little girls.

By the way. Isn't it a little scary that the Aztecs think the world ends in 2012 and you want Hillary to be elected that year???? Just an odd little coincidence.

The really bizarre part is that they actually think she'd stand a chance if they succeeded in their goal to guarantee McCain's presidency. Why in heaven's name do they think they would be welcome in the Democratic Party 4 years from now? I certainly wouldn't vote for Clinton if they managed it. There's no way I'd reward that kind of behavior.

Jack Off you will not ever vote for a woman so not woried about ur vote.

welcome in the Dem party? who u kidding. women own the DEM party and we are taking it BACK!

so go crawl away. bye bye!!!!!!!!!!!

Lest anyone think that the thing known as "joe reader" might have a point in fact my decision concerning who to vote for in the primaries was a close thing. And in fact I have voted for women as my U.S. Senator, State Treasurer, State Secretary of State and Governor in the past and will be voting for women candidates this fall as well.

What aspect of Clinton's and McCain's OPPOSITE POSITIONS is "luny-tuny" to you?

Obama's stated positions are -far- more similar to Hillary's than McCain's. It seems utterly ridiculous that this concept isn't getting through to so many people.

That is, until you factor in that the PUMAs never supported Hillary for any substantive reason in the first place. If you can make the leap from Hillary to McCain at this point, you're just demonstrating how shallow your understanding was to begin with.

PUMA = low-information voter. That's all there is to it.

Joe Reader,

You get the award for the most asinine comment I've seen all week.

"Rov v. Wade was whacked in 2007 and liberals didn't say a word. WE need to vote McCain this year..."

uh, you do know that McCain is PRO-LIFE, no?

I usually try to avoid ad hominem snark.... but holy flippin' crap, guy...