Re: No birth control=welfare checks 4 me!!
by
rark
08/08/2008, 9:34 PM #
Thank you for your honest reply and criticism. I definitely admit that NFP is not something I'd describe as simple or easy. I didn't mean to sugar coat, but was trying to type a timely reply to some frustrating comments and did so while on the phone trying to cancel flights (yuck!). I'm glad my post was taken seriously and I can clarify and continue the discussion.
I didn't feel alternatives to birth control had been represented accurately if at all in the posts, and wanted to get the basics out there.
Certainly NFP can be frustrating, but it is something that has some significant health benefits and I consider it worth it. I'll admit that given no restrictions on sex, my husband and I would have more sex than we do on NFP. But we have a fun and exciting sex life - there is nothing routine about it, and we stay in close communication as a result of NFP.
As for the rules, yes, you do need to keep to end-of-the-day sex at the first half of the cycle, but not the second. The every-other-day sperm thing is only until you are confident in your ability to not have a false reading the next day. That doesn't take too long to get the hang of (some kegels, basically). I am VERY familiar with the breastfeeding portion of NFP, and it is definitely the most frustrating aspect. However, knowing that I'm not introducing hormones to my breastfeeding baby helps with the frustration. Yes, getting used to the method and the rules can take some work at first, but I have found it to be simple and routine. You check the same way each time you use the restroom and it takes almost no time. Forgetting isn't an issue after the first little while.
I have not used the Marquette method involving the ClearBlue monitor, but am using their in-the-final-stages online charting system (for mucus obervations, the Clearblue monitor, or a combination of the two) and am somewhat familiar with the idea for the monitor use. Basically, you consider yourself fertile 6 days from your earliest peak day in the last 6 cycles until the monitor reads a Peak. Personally, I am comfortable with observations so it hasn't been an issue for me to deal with. I have heard good things about the Sympto-Thermal method.
I understand that not everyone shares my values or views, but I do think that a lot of people don't have a concept of NFP. It seems that the majority of people just take the Pill without thinking, and most physicians presribe it as a cure-all. I think already most people don't think about how unnatural contraception is. Then when an article like Saleton's is posted that further confuses the difference between natural and unnatural, I get annoyed.
And yes, I understand that the original poster did not mean that natural birth control means you can't have sex if you don't want children, but it seems to me there is a lot of misunderstanding about NFP (i.e. confusing it with 60's style rhythm methods) or as church propaganda to trick people into having more kids.