Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Why should America want 4 more years of Bush?
by capslock

What the fuck has it done for the avg Jane/Jamal blow?

No really, my dog could've done better running this country than Bush...at least she's cute and does weird shit with her snout when she's pissed off at me so '...Obama would be worse..' is a fuckin brain dead as reason to accept for more years of Bush via McSame policies.

Jus askin, McSames fuckin stupid and no one likes him so we might has well talk about the guy for 32 seconds

thx

Re: Why should America want 4 more years of Bush?
by RasputinsLiver
Cons would prefer total ruination of the country, like Kamakazis saving face by suiciding in WW2, to admitting they were wrong and having America righted, as opposed to right-winged, and not having their party in control.
Re: Why should America want 4 more years of Bush?
by tsedek
Didn't we ask this question in '04? I think Bush could probably beat Barry if he was running this time. Dems need to nominate a candidate who can win a national general election, not just Democratic primaries. Same problem they've had since McGovern.
Re: Why should America want 4 more years of Bush?
by capslock

Not exactly, America usually doesn't change war horses mid-stream so even though I don't like stupid ass'd kkkons for voting for Bush I can't blame them 100 percent

Bush's approval rating is in the low 20's so I don't think Bush can beat Obama or McSame now.

But why in the hell would someone want the same shit...

tsedek:
Didn't we ask this question in '04? I think Bush could probably beat Barry if he was running this time. Dems need to nominate a candidate who can win a national general election, not just Democratic primaries. Same problem they've had since McGovern.

Re: Why should America want 4 more years of Bush?
by tsedek

"But why in the hell would someone want the same shit..."

You see the posts here, there are still folks who would vote Bush over Gore or Kerry, even knowing what they know now.

Americans in the flyover states have a naturally conservative streak and they tend to be a little gullible if the right words are used. St. Bill knew the language, the rituals, and could connect with the people because he was one of them. Barry doesn't have the accent, he doesn't have three terms as successful Arkansas governor, and he always pitched his policies toward a moderate center. Obama just comes across as too big city, too radically left, and, with Sharpton talking and reparations on the table, too black.

Barry could make a dent if he wasn't so limp. He's against the Blunder, but won't end it. He wants to help little people, but little people are seeing that his "help" has made inflation worse. Obama thinks he can win by whipping the rich, most people I know respect rich, educated people and don't really hate them and want to punish them.

Obama just sends out a lot of negative vibes for the heartland types, including me. Hopeheads can write it off as racist, but he just doesn't connect with me. He's not a Boomer, he's not a veteran, he's not a working man, and he's not St. Bill. I'm still open to conversion, but I don't see him offering either a fast enough end to the Blunder or a sensible economic plan, so I'll probably stick with an old, white veteran and hope I live til '12 so I can vote for Gore again.

View as RSS news feed in XML