Even more insensitive than previously thought
by
Fernando
07/21/2007, 11:26 AM #
From your reply:
"As for the poster who's insinuating that this article wouldn't have been posted were it about American airlines: are you kidding? That would have been even better."
I'm this poster, and I'm shocked.
If it were 300 victims instead of 200, would it have even better too?
I am Brazilian, and I would really welcome a fact-based, thoughtful piece about the problems we are facing with our airports and our ATC. I'd be the first to congratulate Slate for doing this. It would be an excellent starting point for discussing what needs to be done to fix that.
What you gave us instead is just a factless anectodal piece, hyperbolically titled to grab more Web hits, where you slander TAM and bitch about staying in a bad hotel in Manaus, but never touch the real problems we have. That this is a "commentary" piece is no excuse for not providing any meaningful facts to support your opinion.
This is journalism at its worst. You should stay at Gawker or Dealbraker. Slate deserves better.
For the fellow Brazilians writing here at the fray, Elizabeth does not represent the typical americans, who are usually sensitive and not smug about tragedies abroad.