enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Or on the other hand...
by Doug Graves
+2 Reply

Let's see:

Mr. Giuliani let's say hypothetically after three and half years as President there have been no Al-Quida attacks in the United States, would you then begin to address the health care crisis?

.........

Mr. Romney, What would the terrorist threat level, as determinced by the combined intellegience agencies, have to be for you to turn your attention to the future insovency of the Social Secuity System?

.....................

Mr. Thompson, if it was reasonably alleged that one of the prisoners in Guantanmo had information about widespread corruption amount military contractors, what intergation methods would you allow? Please be specfic.

Oh and a follow-up-Would the constitution, yes I mean the US constitiution play any role in your discision?

==========

Congrats to Mr. Seely-very funny

Excellent Questions
by FaxMeBeer
I feel like I'm in "1984".
Re: Or on the other hand...
by smitn
Follow-up to Senator Obama: A comet's tail passes through the Earth's orbital path, releasing mass numbers of brain-eating zombies to prey on the living. How do you propose to save society as we know it without being shot on sight for being the 'wrong' color? Follow-up to Mr. Thompson: Is that brunette on your series as hot as she looks? Please elaborate. Follow-up to Mr. Guiliani: Isn't it true that except for your composure and excellence at public speaking following 9/11, that you would have gone down in history as, at best, a mediocre mayor of NYC, in a long line of legacy which redefines the meaning of mediocrity? Follow-up to Mr. Romney: Would you like to change your previous answer, yet again, given current public response to polls? Senator Clinton: Do you intend to prosecute Jeb Bush for his complicity with the enemy in intentionally skewing Florida's voting results, thus electing his brother, despite public proclamation, and triggering mass murder of innocent civilian Americans? And may I add my thanks as well to Hart Seely? I clicked the link expecting some tongue-in-cheek commentary, but instead found thought provoking and cogent commentary.
Re: Or on the other hand...
by middleview
Mass numbers of brain eating zombies....is that what happened to the republican party?
Re: Or on the other hand...
by keef2333

Sen. Clinton: What kind of social medicine at the expense of the American taxpayer do you have in mind for those who are obese,refuse to exercise, abuse drugs and alcohol, and/or refuse to work despite there being some available job?

Sen. Edwards: I'm elderly and on a fixed income. I think Rx drugs should be free because my husband and I have a winter trailer in Fla, three nights/ week at the Indian Casino slot machines, and an illegitimate grandchild to raise because our daughter won't sue for child support. Will you promise to make the drugs free for us? Those greedy bastard Pharm Cos.

Re: Or on the other hand...
by Conner2L
Wow, I dont even know how to respond to that post. I really dont think that Americans not taking care of their health has anything to do with a nationalized healthcare system. You do of course realize that you pay for the costs associated with those people already, through the private system....or are existing in some sort of alternate universe......?
Re: Or on the other hand...
by NightSwimmer

Gee Whiz Keefer,

With all of that going on inside your head, I don't see how you manage to drag yourself out of bed in the morning! Your's must be one miserable existence.

Re: Or on the other hand...
by keef2333

Night Schwimmer:

I pop out of bed quite easily each morning, thanks. The exercise in "absurdist" debate questions posed to candidates was the subject of the commentary I believe. I found the mock questions to Dems funny and saw the irony. I also believe my questions, while perhaps not funny, proved the same point. Each time there has a been a Dem debate the same loaded, socialist leaning questions are posed so the candidates are allowed to pontificate in generalities but not specifics. Evidently you are so married to a philosophy or political party that anything right = bad - anything left = good.

Believe it or not, my money has gone to, and my vote will go to Sen. Obama. I don't agree with him on everything but think he would govern as an optimistic president and would do much to heal this nation both here and abroad.

View as RSS news feed in XML