Two Compelling Reasons To Not Vote For McCain
by
Greco
07/06/2008, 4:08 PM #
There are two compelling reasons to not vote for John McCain. The first is the candidate himself. All issues, other than the Iraq war, take a second position to John McCain. It's his one "self-proclaimed" strength. However, other than Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, it's impossible to find anyone with less credibility on the Iraq war than John McCain. He's spent years making claims and his claims are public record.
John McCain is campaigning on his unwavering support for Bush’s needless war in Iraq. He’s even said we should stay there for 100+ years. He’s trying to project the image that he has superior knowledge about this needless war and it’s a cornerstone of his presidential campaign.
But John McCain has a problem. He has a record on Iraq. He has a record he can be, and should be judged by.
John McCain has repeatedly confused Sunni and Shiite religious sects, revealing a stunning ignorance for a senator who claims to be the sole possessor of superior knowledge and judgment regarding U.S. involvement in Iraq. Frankly, McCain has an astonishing record of inaccurate assessments and poor predictions about Bush’s needless war in Iraq. From his nonsensical assessment of the security of Baghdad to his assertions of political progress in Iraq, which even the top U.S. commander in that country contradicts, McCain has a damning history of being wrong on Iraq.
McCain said the war in Iraq would be “One of the best things that’s happened to America.” While appearing on NBC’s Meet The Press, McCain said, “We’re going to be all right. We’re going to prevail and we will win and it’ll be one of the best things that’s happened to America and the world in a long time ‘cause it’ll reverberate throughout the Middle East.” (March 3, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent and no “reverberation”, this is “one of the best things that’s happened to America”?
McCain predicted “Great Joy and Pleasure in Iraq”. While appearing on NBC’s Meet The Press, McCain said, “I believe that these people have the same yearnings for freedom and democracy and independence and self-determination that every person on earth does, and once this Gestapo is off of their backs, then I think you will see great joy and pleasure that we were able to free them and that will not come until they are sure that they don’t have Saddam Hussein returning again.” (March 30, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent and where’s the “great joy and pleasure” in Iraq” Instead, we’re battling insurgents, that’s Iraqi citizens, that seem to be annoyed with an invasion and prospect of a 100+ year occupation.
McCain said Bush led with “clarity and did not exaggerate the case for war”. In 2003, McCain praised George W. Bush’s leadership on the Iraq war saying, “I think the president has let with great clarity and I think he’s done a great job leading the country, don’t you all?” And asked if he thought the president exaggerated the case for war, McCain said, “I don’t think so.” (MsNBC Hardball, April 4, 2003 / Fox News July 31, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent, no weapons of mass destruction in 200 known sites, no nuclear threat, no clear and present danger to America, in fact 100% of Bush’s claims used as sole justification for starting his needless war turned out to 100% false, and McCain says “no exaggeration”.
McCain said that disarming Iraq would, “Significantly Improve the Stability of The Region.” In a 2003 New York Times op-ed, McCain wrote, “Many critics suggest that disarming Iraq through regime change would not result in an improved peace. There are risks in this endeavor, to be sure. But no one can plausible argue that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein will not significantly improve the stability of the region and the security of American interests and values. (March 13, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent, and no “stability in the region”. We don’t even have “stability in Iraq”. We don’t even have “stability” in Baghdad. We don’t even have “stability” in the Green Zone. Then there’s the issue of Bush’s needless war enhancing Iran’s influence in the region to a point where the Republicans are contemplating starting yet another war they can lose.
McCain predicted “Jubilant Iraqis Would Diminish Anti-American Sentiment in The Middle East.” In the build up to the Iraq war, McCain stated that it is “more likely that antipathy toward the United States in the Islamic world might diminish amid the demonstrations of jubilant Iraqis celebrating the end of a regime that has fee equals in its ruthlessness. (American Conservative Magazine, February 11, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent and no “jubilant Iraqis” The reality is, Bush’s blunder in strategy allowed a civil war to erupt. The fact is, anti-American sentiment in the Middle East has swelled the ranks of al-Qaeda as a great recruiting tool. The fact is, all of our own intelligence agencies are on the record in stating the Iraq war has made America less safe. In the face of this evidence, McCain wants to continue this mistake for 100+ years.
Repeatedly, McCain Claimed The United States Would Win Easily in Iraq. In 2002 and 2003, before the invasion, McCain repeatedly claimed success in Iraq would be easy and minimized potential risks. According to CNN, McCain stated, “Because I know that as successful as I believe we will be, and I believe that the success will be fairly easy, we will still lose some American young men or women.” (March 17, 2003)
Five years later, 4,100+ dead Americans, $3 trillion spent, a civil war in progress, tens of thousands more troops and this is “easy”? It was “easier” and faster to defeat the Germans and Japanese in WW II than to just create order in Iraq. It was so “easy” McCain now thinks we should still be working on it for 100+ years.
When it comes to Iraq, a cornerstone to his bid to become president, John McCain has a record we can view and judge him by. He’s been consistent. He’s been consistently wrong. He’s been wrong, dead wrong. He was wrong then. He’s wrong now. His claims are not subject to spin. They’re documented and reveal the danger of allowing anyone so consistently wrong the opportunity to make the mess he helped create, get worse.
John McCain, who has been consistently wrong, is wrong for America. His own well established record proves that beyond any doubt.
The second compelling reason to not vote for John McCain is his wife. Usually it's a good idea to leave a candidate's family out of the debate, but this year Republicans wanted to bring in the character of candidate's wives into the political fray. Even John McCain's wife has actually joined in on the discussion of his opponent's wife, so a discussion of McCain's wife is now appropriate.
Republicans sure know how to pick ‘em.
For years now they’ve basked in the glow of knowing they helped install Laura Bush in the White House, our nation’s only First Lady that has actually killed someone. This precedent-setting move seemed like a high standard to duplicate, but to their great delight they’ve found a suitable replacement.
Republicans are just thrilled at the prospect of having Cindy McCain as our nation’s next First Lady. She comes with all the attributes Republicans hold dear to their hearts. She’s an adulterer, helping to end a fourteen year marriage. According to her husband, she’s both a “trollop and a c**t”!
But it gets even better.
The object of the new Republican affection is also a drug addict. Wow, those Republicans are just drooling over that one. But wait, there’s more. She’s also a thief, a thief that actually got caught stealing drugs from a charity designed to help impoverished countries. Cindy McCain also was a key player in the infamous political corruption scandal referred to as “The Keating Five”. Her resume has Republicans in a state of nirvana.
But there’s even more.
Cindy McCain has also had prior issues of violations with the Federal Election Commission. Republicans really, really love that one. But there’s one additional aspect of her bona fides that put her in a class by herself. Only a few weeks ago she actually earned over $2 million from her business investments in a third-world nation practicing genocide.
Republicans are just ecstatic over the mere prospect of having someone with such exemplary credentials represent them. By comparison with Laura Bush, who only killed someone, Cindy McCain raises the Republican standards to unprecedented heights. They can think of no better standard bearer to represent them, and are confidant nations around the world will admire her most excellent resume, knowing she’s a true reflection of all Republicans.
They believe Cindy McCain brings the “grand” to the Grand Old Party.
