when "dear abby" was alive, she had a staff of 3 or 4 "assistants" who would review the thousands of letters, then hybridize them into a few coherent themes, since any individual letter was unlikely to be written well enough to be comprehensible, let alone worthy of publication.
i read somewhere that the average american reads at the 5th grade level (hence the popularity of the reality TV show "are you smarter than a WalMart greeter"). of course people who actually read at the 5th grade level (or lower) weren't reading that article - they were watching the TV show instead. and even if they'd read the report, it wouldn't have offended them. its just some college professor insulting the values of middle america, after all . ..
its hard to tell how much hybridization takes place in the prudie letters. i don't get the sense that "prudie the 2nd" has access to a support staff (or even a living wage) in the pursuit of her art. and she's about dropped off the radar scope as far as her other slate series on reality based jobs goes.
i imagine the most difficult part of writing prudie responses is finding letters which are funny enough and controversial enough to bring the readers back week after week. that of course is how emily keeps her job ("your clicks are down this week, emily. kick it up a notch, or you're dead meat")
thus, we descend away from the erudite atmosphere of the washington post (and some of the other slate columns) into the realm of the national inquirer.
ghosts. tawdry affairs. relatives behaving badly. unrequited love. soon it will be UFO sightings and detox summer camp, i imagine.
and prude may even be more popular (higher clicks) for it.
slate, after all (and its parent company the Washington Post) are in a fight for their survival. Slate only makes money from the ads, and despite the vaunted "power of the internet" they have grave difficulties matching their advertisers to their audience demographic.
as i write this, i'm seen banner ads at the top and sidebar of prudie for things like
- "the endless pool" which is like an unheated hot tub with a current you must swim against, to lose flab if jogging isn't your thing
- "how to find affordable health insurance" which features picture of a black family, thus playing to racial stereotypes of americas economic oppression
- "body armor for your PC" which is an antivirus program not made by norton, symantic, or any other recognized expert in the field. unfortantely, if you can read slate online, you probably already use norton or symantic to keep your PC operating.
i don't begrude prudie (and slate) their foibles. they're playing to a demographic, trying to expand their readership. they're fighting for their lives