Re: Congress in theory can't pass an "ex post facto" law
by
Seasoldier
07/02/2008, 11:33 PM #
See President Eisenhower Ex Post Facto sign papers to bring Ohio into the Union in 1953! Hummmmmm
Seasoldier/Last night
Regarding "Treaties," you are telling me that Congress has no part in constructing, contriving, or framing such treaties?
Ever LAW becomes law by the EXECUTIVE BRANCH SIGNING THAT LAW! Who wrote the legislative words--the contract--the asinine presidents?
Example:
""Treaty
Power
The
case of Missouri v Holland (1920) presented the Court with an
opportunity
to define the reach of the treaty power. Missouri challenged the
federal government's regulation of the hunting of migratory birds,
including
its setting of seasons, hunting methods, and limits. The
regulations
were adopted under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, implementing a
treating
signed by the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). The
Court
upheld the regulations, even though they were not supported by specific
Article I powers of Congress, as a reasonable implication of the
President's
Article II power to "make treaties." The Court cautioned,
however,
that the treaty-implementing power could not be used as an excuse for
regulating
activities that were not "a proper subject of regulation." ""War And Treaty Powers
I've never heard of president legislating an ACT without first the congress running it threw their mill floor.