Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 2 (18 items)   1 2 Next >
Creepy Alex Ad
by zuko
+4/-1 Reply

Bill Kristol's latest piece in the Times was truly pathethic. The Republican spin machine has cranked out it's last. Oh, his piece had all the elements which have worked so well for the last 8 years - the honor of the military, patriotic mothers slamming the left, little snide references and red meat to throw out to the base - but those days are over.

Being guilty of romantic notions, doesn’t prohibit them from being true. Recently, a romantic notion has revolved around the idea that not only is Barak Obama unbeatable, but he will charge to victory with little more exertion than burning ants under a magnifying glass - an effortless exercise in curiosity.

The romantic part, but mostly untrue, is that Obama will win through sheer will and his own strident force. The reality is, McCain is defenseless. The big Republican machine that has weaved so perfectly, in and out, between half-truths, whole lies and shameless propaganda, to sell themselves, their ideals and the war is dead. This year, Willie Nelson could win.

Once fueled by fear mongering, endless deception and eight years of Rovian pretzel logic, the big red machine is finally kaput. The jig’s up.

Voters are no longer buying wholesale their high octane blend of fantasy, fiction and dogma. Not because they wouldn’t be happy to - I, myself, would love to tuck into bed each night believing in Iraqi democracy and ridding the world of tyrants, being more safe through pre-emptive wars against Muslims - who wouldn’t? Sounds dreamy. But the very unpleasant facts of life - reality some are beginning to call it - keeps popping up and the Republican fast talkers can’t keep it all below the waterline.

The only defense McCain will have will be a few diehards pounding away on the blogs, stirring and swift boating. (Hey, Bush’s 28% approval numbers have to come from somewhere.)

There’s little left Obama need do other than give Americans permission to look; it’s okay, yes, at the man with no clothes……….yes, he is actually naked.

In a striking example of that nakedness, Bill Kristol attempts to discredit a Moveon.org television ad, “Not Alex”. Like a punch drunk fighter flailing at shadows, his embarrassing swings only highlight the pitiful condition of the conservative position.

The ad is simple. A mother speaks as she holds her baby boy:

“Hi, John McCain. This is Alex. And he’s my first. So far his talents include trying any new food and chasing after our dog. That, and making my heart pound every time I look at him. And so, John McCain, when you say you would stay in Iraq for 100 years, were you counting on Alex? Because if you were, you can’t have him.”

Kristol’s first takes a couple of sideswipes that he infers are “picky”. (He can’t help trying the ‘aw shucks, I’m jest sayin’, routine. Can‘t harvest if you don‘t plant seeds.) He points out that after a two term McCain presidency Alex will only be 9 years old,inferring that as a practical matter, the mother’s concern is unwarranted. That’s just lame. He must get paid by the word.

Then he points out, presumably, Alex has little to fear from McCain’s famous remark about the 100 years war. In 20 years, Alex’s generation would be ’protecting US interests’ rather than actually ‘fighting’ - ala our presence in Germany, Japan, Korea, Kristol implies.

But the days of feeding the faithful with that sort of dead end logic are over. Even the yellow ribbon set understand the Alex ad is symbolic. Yes Bill, they’re that smart. Most people now understand, at an essential level, that we’ve wasted far too many lives, for increasingly unclear reasons, in Iraq. His jabs aren’t even humorous anymore, just sad and transparent. Even Charlie Brown finally quit trying to kick the football balancing under Lucy’s finger. It took a long time, but he got it. So have we.

Parents get it. Americans get it. Plenty of other Alex’s have indeed come of age and sent to Iraq to die in the previous 5 years. Whether he’s 1, 13, or 30, a McCain policy would have no qualms about shipping them off to the desert to die in an effort that a majority of voters clearly find less than fruitful.

He goes on to defend McCain’s tired argument which compares our presence in Iraq with those in Germany or Japan……. so idiotic, it’s not even anymore contemplated by rational folk.

Kristol continues, “But it is surely relevant to point out that the United States has an all-volunteer Army. Alex won’t be drafted, and his mommy can’t enlist him. He can decide when he’s an adult whether he wants to serve.”

That may be the saddest commentary of all.

(Right here I’ll disregard the thousands of middle aged National Guardsmen, electricians and plumbers and school teachers, who suddenly one day found themselves in fire fights in the streets of Bagdad, which is a different, infinitely sad, issue.)

Young men sign up to defend the United States from their enemies. In defense……..not on some wild eyed hunch born out of theoretical exercise. The truth that young men and women chose to die in defense of their country’s freedom and each other - not the propagation of a hair brained scheme - is wholly self-evident to all. Kristol, and the right, no longer have viable positions on sending them off to die in Iraq - just a cheap maze of wordplay. There is too much blood and evidence to stain their versions of the “truth.”

Kristol goes on, “This is the sober truth. Unless we enter a world without enemies and without war, we will need young men and women willing to risk their lives for our nation.”

A child could examine this piece of Kristol fantasy. By sending our troops and our national treasure to evaporate needlessly in the desert of Iraq, we find ourselves woefully unprepared to confront a real threat (read Afghanistan here) and someday may find out gutted economy too battered to take up the fight. Mr. Kristol, pop up from your bunker and look around. Any thought about spending 3 trillion dollars(that’s weird to even type) on a war in Iraq? Any objective contemplation on rotating 2.2 million troops, with an estimated 15% suffering from PTSD? Yes Mr. Kristol, I think we all agree, “we will need young men and women to risk their lives for our nation.”

I’m stopping here, with this classic Kristol gaze through the looking glass:

“ So, why, I wondered after first seeing the MoveOn ad, did I find it so ... Creepy?”

Could that be because you find Dick Cheney not creepy…the ad suffers by some weird parallax comparison? You found it “creepy” for exactly the same reasons you find all things of this nature creepy………it portrays truthfulness.

Real people, real parents sending real kids off to real war. And they don’t find it creepy. Just ugly truth.

Americans understand that after almost 8 years, protecting war criminals with double talk and strange and vicious reasoning, you sir, and the Republican propaganda machine, find the truth creepy indeed.

Sorry Mr. McCain, there was a time when people like Kristol could convince your base to swallow anything, but you’re about eight years and four thousand dead Alex’s too late.

Alex doesn't need to worry
by justoffal

his mother aborted him. :)

I have often thought the same about the volunteer army thing..the guys who were sent back for three and four tours without being consulted surely didn't feel like volunteers.

I don't know what role military power will play in our future...I suspect that we would have no rights at all if we didn't defend them at one time or another.

Will we move forward into a world that does not require military presence. I dunno...I can see Iran tearing us out a new asshole in about six weeks if we didn't have a Military to defend us..and doing it with full justification that they had every right to be aggressive just because they can.

Ugly truth...we aren't done with wars yet.

Re: Alex doesn't need to worry
by zuko

We certainly aren't through with war, but even Alex's mother knows, "you fight the ones you can win."

And wars fought from a strong moral position are all winnable.

I think this perception that the US is invicable should be looked at more closely. I think the past few weeks at the gas pump has made a lot of people realize that when we put ourselves in an unwinnable situation, we pay the price just like everybody.

But to the point I was trying to make, I think that the current Administration has lied so much, and been caught so often, that anything out of McCain's mouth won't be taken very seriously.

From a cash flow perspective, Obama had no choic ebut to reject the limits of public financing. But I think from a practical standpoint, there's very little he needs to do that couldn't be accomplished with the 85 million in public funds. But November McCain will be a laughting stock.

Sounds like I'm being tough on poor John, I don't mean to be, but he just doesn't have it. Wrong timing.

z

Looks to be a blowout...
by justoffal

Obama coming in with a 200 to 300 million war chest and going straight into the heart of GOP territory.

$$$$$OBAMABUCKS$$$$$$

The gop will pay dearly for not stopping Bush in his war on the middle class, but the constituency didn't do it soon enough, the damage cannot ever be undone. As visionary as he is Obama cannot face down the powerful forces that Bush has unleashed. The Power of the US Presidency is no truly viable and I don't think it can be restored by anyone. Bush acted as the catalyst between the ruling powers of the US and the already up and running forces of Globalism, he tore down the last few remaining bastions of middle class integrity and has opened us up to the real onslaught of Elitism unlike anything we have ever seen before.

Give it 30 years and we will have a World Order of easants supporting a very small, very powerful, very wealthy ruling class. It has been their vision and their dream for the past 100 years.

Give it 30 years?
by Smarmalade

We...in 30 years you might still be alive, but if I am lucky I can count my blessings and be among the long gone, long dead and buried.

No matter what, it all stinks to high heaven...both candidates are really stinking stink.

Sorry, but that is the last word for today.

Off I go into "Over the Rainbow" land.. : ))

Cheers and Ciao!

Few creepier things imaginable than
by tartuffe

William "The Bloody" Kristol

It was an excellent piece
by JackDallas

Kristol is one of the brightest minds in the business. I have rarely seen him wrong about anything he addresses.

Jack

Two arms of the same party
by justoffal

I got that the other day from another poster....right and left arms of the corporatist party.

We were never meant to do the choosing...behind door number 1, number 2 and number 3 is the same hungry lion.

Wait a minute...
by Sawbones

I'm a part of the yellow ribbon set.

I hope you're right that Americans' weariness of being played for fools by the Republicans trumps their gullibility and fear when right-wing 527 groups present them with Obama's Muslimhood, Kenyan supremacism and secret habit of ritual child sacrifice. Given past experience, it's not necessarily a slam dunk.

Hmmm. Perhaps I could have chosen my words better. My bad.

BTW, an excellent piece of writing.

Re: Wait a minute...
by zuko

I like the link.

When you consider what's a stake for the Republicans, I wouldn't put anything past them. We just watch this thing as a sort of amusement compared to the life and death matter that it is for them.

But with the recent trends in Ohio and Penn., I really believe we've rounded the corner on business as usual. At least in the rhetoric. Many of the people supporting Bush in 04 were very much on the fence, and Rove Inc was able to push them over. Not the case this tiime.

z

Blathering Bill Kristol
by Thrasymachus

The Not Alex ad makes no rational argument against the war. In fact, it goes out of its way to deliberately bury the distinction between a 100 year peaceful occupation of Iraq and a 100 year war there beneath an avalanch of heart-yanking motherly pathos.

That's why I freaking love it, and why Bill Kristol hates it so much that he's driven into incoherence by sheer fury.

It's the same kind of brilliant, ruthless cheapshot that the Republicans always use on us. Not Alex is a down-payment on what they have coming for 20 years of running deceptive ads like Wolves.

So what you're saying is...
by FieldingBandolier

the only ethical problem you have with manipulative, deceptive ads is that Democrats haven't been using them.

If the Republicans have been wolves for the past 20 years, what does that make Democrats now?

Rove undoubtedly fancies himself a hero.

Re: So what you're saying is...
by Thrasymachus

Rove undoubtedly fancies himself a hero.

Rove does fancy himself a hero, undoubtedly. Anyway, I wasn't calling the Republicans wolves. I was referring to a specific ad from the 2004 Bush campaign called "Wolves." It won them that election, much the way the Willie Horton ad helped the elder Bush win in 1988.

I'm not saying anybody's a hero for using cheap political shots in campaign ads. It's tacky, but not a crime. And when it comes to the merely tacky, I think turnabout is fair play.

Re: Creepy Alex Ad
by JackD
Willie Nelson? That guy wears headscarves, man. That scares people.
"Tacky"...
by FieldingBandolier

but not illegal.

That's your ethical yardstick?

The people marketing for the Republican party have been cultivating collective ignorance by strategically fostering spurious associations. So now the Democrats have figured out how to play at the same level, you chortle?

You want an "integrity litmus test" for Obama?

Has he said anything about media ownership laws?

I'll vote for him (much good it will do him here), but my disaffection grows daily.

There's a means and ends problem here nobody's talking about. But what the hell, if we believe our cause is noble enough, we can justify most anything, right?

These guys don't get it - if we're all trading in the politics of fear, the more socially regressive position will eventually win out. Every time.

Page 1 of 2 (18 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML