Hello, princess:
There's something between painting and astrophysics.
Namely the mind-numbingly dull, mid- (or even high-) level management jobs in banks, insurance agencies, law firms hospitals, government, airlines, etc.
The jobs that pay reasonably or even very well. The jobs that don't "fulfill" anything except mortgage obligations and the like.
E.g., your little doo-hickey job writing things for Slate.
Imagine if our culture indicated to girls that they must always have before them the prospect of supporting a spouse and family on a single income (theirs).
Or a single real income, supplemented by her spouse's occasional forays into the workforce or whatever he could scrape up from the rare sale of his paintings.
This would have been item #1 on the feminist agenda: equalize the financial responsibility of the family between spouses.
But no.
Our culture more/less requires boys to go into finance and medicine and law. It allows girls to do so but who takes it seriously?
When we all know, on some level, the girl can opt out of the work force.
Both with the support of the patriarchy.
And all the Sarah Lawrence graduates who pretend since they don't want to do brain surgery (altho they could!) they might as well throw pottery.
No wonder women can't get tenure-track positions in the hard sciences. Partner in law. The Presidency.
Women who seek "fulfillment" make it impossible for their sisters--who are perhaps less flakey--to break barriers.
Everyone assumes behind every strong and successful woman is someone who really would rather just stay home and bake cookies.
And whine.