I feel the need to try to clarify something. The article states that "Oregon quickly abandoned rationing." This is not accurate.
I practice medicine in Oregon, and the Oregon Health Plan has been working since I arrived here over 8 years ago for Medicaid patients, sometimes better, sometimes worse. Compared to the rest of the country, however, I think we do much better. We currently have a list of things OHP covers and doesn't cover, and it is not based strictly on cold economic principles. We do have real people who make the final decisions about what makes sense to cover and not cover. The decision makers don't always get it right, but decisions that are made at a local level are much more accepted than those imposed from outside, and can be more quickly reversed by raising taxes or cutting benefits. Yes, there are difficult decisions that always need to be made, but people who pay for care need to have the right to determine what care they pay for.
The rest of the country may want to continue to dismiss our system, but someday soon when the rest of our national health care system has imploded, maybe everyone will be more willing to take another look at it.
You all might want to check out our former Governor Kitzhaber's latest project called the Archemedes Project. I think their web site is www.wecandobetter.org.