enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by Joelcan

The Alger Hiss case has always been a murky one, his innocence or guilt still a matter of the kind of ongoing speculation featured in this article. The fact that it has never been resolved satisfactorily makes it clear that (a) nothing was really at stake and (b) Hiss was just used as a tool to launch Nixon into prominence and scare America into thinking Communists were about to seize the Capitol, the White House and maybe even their shiny new lawns.

Just as now the government tries to scare us into thinking that every Muslim is getting ready to try and blow us up (so we better blow them up first!), the prosecution of Alger Hiss was just a means to an end. Fear is the means to power and control when the government is a fraud and doesn't have any real concern to its constituents' well-being.

Like now.

Alger Hiss, guilty or innocent? Who cares. Nixon did far more damage than any spy could've done and Bush continues the fine tradition.


Re: Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by jeff kisseloff
I always find it sad when someone attempts to settle serious and important historical issues by name-calling. Usually when someone descends to such tactics, the facts aren't on that person's side. Such is the case with Mr. Rosenbaum's article. I would suggest that those interested in the case, give Bird and Chervonnaya's article (on which I helped with the research) a read and then head over to www.algerhiss.com to read some of the supporting documents and related material regarding this important new information. None of the arguments or suggestions in the story were presented frivolously. Indeed, the article was years in the making and was the product of a great deal of careful thought and discussion among many people familiar the case. As for the reference to Sam Tanenhaus's article, I will be preparing an in-depth response that should be appearing on the site in a few weeks. If Mr. Rosenbaum believes that Allen Weinstein and Tanenhaus put to rest the question of Hiss's guilt, he is seriously mistaken. As one long time Hiss expert liked to say, "Both are very convincing, unless you know the record." Mr. Rosenbaum apparently doesn't.
Re: Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by jeff kisseloff
Unfortunately, a poor Internet connection prevented me from making what I think is one more salient point. I was one of the people who went to work for Alger Hiss in the 1970s. Yes, Alger was charming and brilliant, but I had every intention of protecting myself, and I asked him scores and scores of questions about the case. I told myself that if I didn't think he was telling me the truth to any one of those questions, I'd walk out the door. He never flinched from one of them, and I never walked. And when Allen Weinstein claimed in "Perjury" that the defense files showed Hiss was lying, I went over every one of those issues with him. Then, all I had to do was reach behind my desk to see who was telling the truth, because that's where the defense files were stored. In every single instance, a check of the files showed that Alger and not Weinstein was telling the more accurate story about what the files showed. That's why I worked for him and still do.
Re: Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by speakup

We should care about the Hiss case because the world spent over 50 years, billions of dollars, thousands of lives lost and millions more wasted in suffering, in sorting out whether or not Communism or Capitalism were better systems for humanity.

Both sides of that fight abused power, made bad decisions based on inaccurate information, and made "lesser of two evils" choices, but only one side sought to enslave the human soul in service of the state-- Communism. And while Capitalism is not perfect by any means (and never claimed to be), it was Communism that ultimately proved to be bankrupt by every measure-- economically, socially, environmentally-- you name it.

Those who chose the wrong side of history-- for whatever reasons-- should be honest and acknowledge their decision.

Re: Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by BlueEyes_Austin
Bingo. And it is absolutely pathetic that the defenders of communism still resort to their lies and deciet even now that the human disaster of the system they barrack for is utterly apparent to any casual observer.
Re: Alger Hiss, McCarthyism, Nixon and the USA
by MuhammadFlanagan

I have long had a personal stake in the Hiss case ; my Uncle , THOMAS F . MURPHY , was the prosecuting attorney . Reading ALLEN WEINSTEIN ' s book PERJURY - - both the 1 9 7 8 version and the updated , post VENONA edition two decades later - - has always been illuminating in that no other works have a comparable grasp on the facts .

Alger Hiss was eventually tried for Perjury because it was not possible to try Hiss on charges of espionage . There really is no doubt at all that Hiss lied before a Grand Jury and in front of the House Un - American Activites Committee , when he claimed he neither knew nor recognized WHITTAKER CHAMBERS . Hiss ' s wife PRISCILLA even recognized Chambers from photographs , as did most everyone previously acquainted with Chambers ( other than Alger Hiss . )

The first perjury trial ended inconclusively , with eight jurors voting to convict , four to acquit . Hiss supporters disregard the fact that HUBERT SMITH , jury foreman , declined to recuse himself from the jury even as he had an obligation to do so , as Smith and Hiss were both acquaintences of ANGUS McCORMICK , a criminal justice employee in New York who would subsequently counsel Hiss on ideal conduct while in jail .

Curiously , prosecutor Murphy did not petition for a mistrial after learning about Smith ; it seems MRS . Smith was none too discreet during a visit to a New Jersey nursing home , when she was heard to say her husband believed in Alger Hiss and intended to keep the jury hung . ( I ' d ask my Uncle about this if I could ; unfortunately , Tom Murphy died 2 6 October 1 9 9 5 , and never wrote a memoir about the Hiss trial . )

Prosecutor Murphy has long been the target of misconduct accusations from the Hiss camp - - with the notable exception of CLAUDE CROSS , who replaced LLOYD STRYKER as defense counsel at the second trial . Cross acknowledged that Murphy conducted himself fairly and skillfully , as befits a Government Prosecutor who had a conviction rate of roughly 9 9 per cent .

The Hiss team , under Lloyd Stryker , was notorious for badgering the Government 's witnesses , even to the point of bringing Doctor CARL BINGER , a psychiatrist , to sit in the gallery and attempt to unnerve Whittaker Chambers during cross - examination .

Speaking of Chambers : the former Soviet courier demanded in September of 1 9 3 9 to have an audience with President Roosevelt , there to make his accusations against Alger Hiss . Chambers did get to make his case before ADOLPH BERLE , Deputy UnderSecretary Of State For Internal Security . Note that Chambers first accused Hiss NINE YEARS before he testified in front of the House Un - American Activities Committee .

That security was lax during Roosevelt ' s Presidency really isn ' t in question , even were Hiss demonstrably innocent . The list of ' moles ' includes John Abt , Noel Field , Lee Pressman and Harry Dexter White ( White died of a heart attack before he could be brought to trial . )

The reward for Soviet moles in World War Two America wasn ' t lavish : Hiss himself was eager to leave the State Department because of the low salary , and applied for the CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT ' s Presidency in part because Carnegie would more than double Hiss ' s earnings ( from $ 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 to twenty grand a year . )

SVETLANA CHERVONNASKAYA , proving that history repeats itself , claims to have thoroughly read existing Soviet archives - - and found no reference at all to Alger Hiss . Colonel - General DMITRI VOLCOGANOV did so fifteen years ago , and concluded that not only was there no mention of Alger Hiss , there were no references to Whittaker Chambers either ! This , frankly , is not definitive ; Volcoganov himself acknowledged that many documents have likely been lost or destroyed .

The content of Soviet archives has no bearing on the guilt of Alger Hiss in any event . ( Colonel - General Volkoganov , who made a tentative statement of exoneration regarding Hiss in October 1 9 9 2 , retracted the statement two months later . )

When author Weinstein , seeking Government documents under the Freedom Of Information Act , attempted to avail himself of the H . U . A . C . archives , the House Judiciary Committee sealed the records of the long - defunct H . U . A . C . for FIFTY years , meaning we would not gain access until 2 0 2 6 .

This begs the question : what potentially harmful data did a Democratic - majority House committee forbid Weinstein to see ? It is fortunate that J . Edgar Hoover , F . B . I . director , died four years earlier lest Weinstein be denied access to Bureau files on the Hiss case . ( PERJURY was the end result of nine years ' worth of research , including an interview with ' Josef Peters ' , the Hungarian emigre who supervised Soviet Espionage in America before being deported . )

I would never dispute that RICHARD NIXON made the most of the Hiss case , so as to advance Nixon ' s own notoriety and political ascent . ( Weinstein chides Nixon in a number of instances , mostly for some questionable presentation of ' fact ' in Nixon 's own memoir SIX CRISES . ) It is a bizarre historical circumstance that young Nixon , juniormost member of the H . U . A . C . , was its best - informed congressman regarding the Hiss case : Nixon was befriended by Father JOHN CRONIN , a Catholic Priest from Hiss ' s hometown of Baltimore , who in turn was given access by F . B . I . Director HOOVER to the Bureau ' s files pertaining to Hiss .

I could continue for a frightfully long time on the details of the case , but I ' ll conclude as did Professor Weinstein in the text of PERJURY : " THERE HAS YET TO EMERGE FROM ANY SOURCE A BODY OF EVIDENCE CREDIBLE ENOUGH TO UNDERMINE THE CREDIBILITY OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST ALGER HISS . " This remains true some three decades after the initial publication of PERJURY , and attempts to debunk Weinstein ' s work - - including Navasky , Bird and Chervonnaskaya - - are also similarly wanting .

Hogwash
by aeschylus

So *nobody* -- at least not in any numbers -- truly feared the Red Menace? Whether such fears were unfounded or overblown is irrelevant. Is it your argument that the Right completely fabricated the notion of a communist threat as part of some Machiavellian power grab? And any disfavor that Islam finds itself in has *nothing* to do with current events? There's *no way* anyone in Washington might look at the 2 WTC attacks; the Cole bombing; the African embassy bombings; the Danish cartoon brouhaha; the "Flushed Koran"-inspired violence and the murder of Theo van Gogh, spot the common thread of Islam, and harbor genuine concerns? I'm conflicted about the Iraq War, but was it *all* just Halliburton? Not even a smidgen of overreacting to events based on genuinely held beliefs?

Unbelievable. Has the political atmosphere become so poisonous that we can't even entertain the idea that those on the opposite side of the Left/Right divide -- in enacting "bad" policies -- might actually have been inspired by their genuine worldview (be it paranoid, delusional, or otherwise) and not power for its own sake? (Have you ever read such a needlessly long sentence?)

View as RSS news feed in XML