YOU EITHER MAKE THINGS BETTER---but which things?
by
gala1
06/05/2008, 12:35 PM #
If Hillary Clinton supports Obama, she will heal the Democratic Party and become Vice President.
BUT if Hillary Clinton becomes, instead, McCain's Vice president, she heals the country.
More importantly she becomes part of a team well-situated and responsibly connected to hit the ground running and fix every one of the countless broken things that are the Bush League's legacy.
Obama is a junior Senator with 2 whole years in Congress.
And that is supposed to win an election.
Right.
And what would his faction actually LET Hillary do? Hillary Clinton may have thought she has spent her time in Hell, but this can be a lot worse than anyone could even describe for her. and even more so for Bill Clinton.
McCain is savvy enough to know what BOTH Clinton's can offer and run with it.
Even better, he understands government by coalition in a way Obama's egotistical supporters are never going to let happen.
Should Obama win a and screw up Hillary will be there to blame for it.
Should he lose, Hillary will be blamed for it.
But if she goes with McCain , she maps out a whole new path in American History.
And gets to do what she can do best, solve the problems.
I can't understand this loyalty to the Democratic Party thing.
How loyal and supportive has the Democratic Party been to Hillary, or the Clintons.
Or most importantly, how loyal has the Democratic Party been to any of us?
I am writing in Hillary Clinton on my ballot. The something I want my vote to stand for is voting for the person I believe can do the best job. I don't vote for second best. My vote is too valuable for me to do that.
Obama is unelectable. And McCain needs to be reined in.
I am now hearing way too many people who swore they'd never consider another Republican looking a lot harder at McCain.
You can foist an unsuitable candidate like Obama onto the ticket, but you can't make any of us vote for him.
And on election day, you'll find out we didn't.
-gala1